Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Travis McGee
The prosecution has used the 1st bug man about 200 times...was he more credible then?
305 posted on 07/22/2002 6:01:41 PM PDT by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 300 | View Replies ]


To: Rheo
These guys go where the $ is. Ask O.J. defender Henry Lee.
309 posted on 07/22/2002 6:04:03 PM PDT by Greg Weston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies ]

To: Rheo
If Dusek leans too hard those 200 are going to want a new trial. Dusek is sunk either way. He's toast.
310 posted on 07/22/2002 6:05:44 PM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies ]

To: Rheo
I am only commenting on an eye witness from day one (the front row reporter) saying that the bug men are NOT convincing the jury as determined by their reactions.

You and I have not seen the jury, have we? NO.

Remember your history, in the 1960 debate, those who only HEARD it on the radio said Nixion won, those who SAW it on TV said JFK won.

My point is, it is worth mentioning that the only EYE WITNESS reporter I have heard is getting a very different impression from the JURY REACTION than many DW fans are getting from the radio and TV WITHOUT SEEING THE JURY REACTION.

312 posted on 07/22/2002 6:06:49 PM PDT by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson