Come on. Is this what you would attempt to try someone with. Whether or not they can prove God exists?
How about asking questions of those that have been following this case from the beginning, or asking them to source info or point you to a source, and after getting the information, coming to an informed conclusion?
That is precisely what I was doing and was reacting to someone who presented with a claim that such testimony was in evidence. Those with knowledge of the testimony wouldn't be misleading would they ? Someone actually testified that the dogs proved without a shadow of doubt that Danielle could not have been in the RV in the few weeks before ?