To: UCANSEE2
How about asking questions of those that have been following this case from the beginning, or asking them to source info or point you to a source, and after getting the information, coming to an informed conclusionThat is precisely what I was doing and was reacting to someone who presented with a claim that such testimony was in evidence. Those with knowledge of the testimony wouldn't be misleading would they ? Someone actually testified that the dogs proved without a shadow of doubt that Danielle could not have been in the RV in the few weeks before ?
To: VRWC_minion
Hopefully you can accept my apology for overreacting to you so early. I am trying to catch up on the threads, and you have stuck with it. You have been asking questions. Asking for proof. Good for you. Don't give up, don't let my early posts upset you. Your posts have contributed to the thread, keep going.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson