One hair transfered from Brenda makes it to the guys sink trap ? That is on par with the same probaility I have of winning a McDonalds lottery.
DNA evidence is very important also, but one very small spot ( however did they find it?) does not convince me of Westerfield's guilt.
Why does the size matter?
I want the Prosecution to expalin to me how he was able to get into the home, snatch Dannielle, drag her and carry her to wherever (the MH was not parked at the house) and leave no trace of him at her house or her in his or in his car.
Apparently someone did it.
But yet - one drop of DNA is in his motor home?
Hair, blood or blood like subtance = DNA, plus fingerprints ?
why did she not cry out?
She may have
if he murdered her in her bedroom - why no fibers from his clothes?I doubt she was murdered there, is that the case being made ?
no DNA or hair from him in her room or in her entire house?
I doubt that is true. What may be true is the police didn't gather any.
but yet one single hair was in the MH?
It was my understanding that a hair was found in trap ?