One hair transfered from Brenda makes it to the guys sink trap ? That is on par with the same probaility I have of winning a McDonalds lottery.
DNA evidence is very important also, but one very small spot ( however did they find it?) does not convince me of Westerfield's guilt.
Why does the size matter?
I want the Prosecution to expalin to me how he was able to get into the home, snatch Dannielle, drag her and carry her to wherever (the MH was not parked at the house) and leave no trace of him at her house or her in his or in his car.
Apparently someone did it.
But yet - one drop of DNA is in his motor home?
Hair, blood or blood like subtance = DNA, plus fingerprints ?
why did she not cry out?
She may have
if he murdered her in her bedroom - why no fibers from his clothes?I doubt she was murdered there, is that the case being made ?
no DNA or hair from him in her room or in her entire house?
I doubt that is true. What may be true is the police didn't gather any.
but yet one single hair was in the MH?
It was my understanding that a hair was found in trap ?
and only one hair found in a sink trap makes the place a crime scene - what is the probobility of that?It's obvious that you have not been following the case too closely, and all you want to do is bait and argue.
Why does the size matter?
It matters when the MH is a supposed crime scene
Apparently someone did it.
No - No one proved anything.....
Hair, blood or blood like subtance = DNA, plus fingerprints ?
already went over the 1 hair 1 spot deal.....
She may have
and no one heard her.... yea, right
I doubt she was murdered there, is that the case being made ? no DNA or hair from him in her room or in her entire house? I doubt that is true.
then you had better start reading the transcripts - no evidence that he entered the house or was in her room
What may be true is the police didn't gather any.
yes, that's it! They didn't gather any DNA/other evidence from the ONE suspect that they want to fry for her murder!!! That's the ticket....! what GREAT POLICE WORK!
but yet one single hair was in the MH? It was my understanding that a hair was found in trap ?
I would ask you what your point is, but you have made that apparent, all that you want is to bait people - why not read the transcripts and start following the case like the rest of us?