[VRWC_minion]

The 'blood' and hair evidence are no proof at all

My wife would tend to disagree. So in order to support your belief you must argue the evidence doesn't exist ? Can you do better ?

[CAPPSMADNESS]

Indeed, blood and hair evidence is very important, especially if the blood is proven to be blood and more than one hair (easily transferrable from dancing with Brenda). DNA evidence is very important also, but one very small spot ( however did they find it?) does not convince me of Westerfield's guilt. I want the Prosecution to expalin to me how he was able to get into the home, snatch Dannielle, drag her and carry her to wherever (the MH was not parked at the house) and leave no trace of him at her house or her in his or in his car. But yet - one drop of DNA is in his motor home? why did she not cry out? if he murdered her in her bedroom - why no fibers from his clothes? no DNA or hair from him in her room or in her entire house? but yet one single hair was in the MH?

[UCANSEE2]

The 'blood' and hair evidence are no proof at all My wife would tend to disagree. So in order to support your belief you must argue the evidence doesn't exist ? Can you do better ?

Much better. I am trying to finish reading all the posts. My explanation will take some time, so I want to reserve it for tomorrow. If you really are interested in the DW trial and it's outcome (you seem genuine), I will explain it all tomorrow.