I am excluding all of the other speculation and requests to prove negatives. If there is other positive evidence I would like to hear it.
The opinion of the forensic entomologists that the body was placed there approx. Feb. 12th -16th.
Two experts testified to this.
The first one was chosen/trusted and paid by the prosecution and still stated this. Yet you choose to ignore this testimony, because it doesn't fit with what you believe. CORRECT?
You want to wait for a THIRD expert, because you believe he (without having examined anything yet) will give the ANSWER YOU WANT TO HEAR.
Your statements have made it very obvious this is what you are waiting for.
BTW. You stated that Accounting and Statistics and Probability were exact sciences and BUG EXPERTS were JUNK SCIENCE.
Yet you are willing to trust the one bug expert. Isn't that a contradiction?
The bug experts are using Probability and Statistics to determine their conclusions. So, Probability and Statistics are junk science, RIGHT?
ALSO, I can prove to you that Probability and Statistics do not prove anything valid about your conclusions about the hair, the prints, the DNA in the MH.