The opinion of the forensic entomologists that the body was placed there approx. Feb. 12th -16th.
Two experts testified to this.
The first one was chosen/trusted and paid by the prosecution and still stated this. Yet you choose to ignore this testimony, because it doesn't fit with what you believe. CORRECT?
You want to wait for a THIRD expert, because you believe he (without having examined anything yet) will give the ANSWER YOU WANT TO HEAR.
Your statements have made it very obvious this is what you are waiting for.
BTW. You stated that Accounting and Statistics and Probability were exact sciences and BUG EXPERTS were JUNK SCIENCE.
Yet you are willing to trust the one bug expert. Isn't that a contradiction?
The bug experts are using Probability and Statistics to determine their conclusions. So, Probability and Statistics are junk science, RIGHT?
ALSO, I can prove to you that Probability and Statistics do not prove anything valid about your conclusions about the hair, the prints, the DNA in the MH.
Two separate issues. I am merely attempting to deduce what the prosecutor is up to with a third bug guy. Without getting redundant you can read my several post to follow what I believe will happen.
As to what I want to hear ? Ok, I want to hear a scientifcally sound reason why the original bug guys are wrong and the new bug guy is right. If Goff just attempts to pick apart the other guys work with losts of maybes and could be's I would think the whole excersise is a waste of time.
I must say though that most people who have challenged what my expectations are about what is likely to happen in court seem to me that they would not be able to accept any information that contradicts the original bug guys even if its sound and logical.
You misread what I wrote.