Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: VRWC_minion
All of which need to be considered in light of physical evidence that puts Danielle in the RV. No argument. The question is WHEN?

According to Testimony, the dogs did not HIT on Danielle's scent in the MH or RV. According to information about tracking dogs, they can detect the scent for up to 2 weeks.

IF Danielle would have been in the MH between 02/01/02 and 02/03/02, the dogs should have detected that. They didn't.

137 posted on 07/22/2002 4:31:09 PM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]


To: UCANSEE2
IF Danielle would have been in the MH between 02/01/02 and 02/03/02, the dogs should have detected that. They didn't.

You agree she was in the RV then ?

139 posted on 07/22/2002 4:32:36 PM PDT by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies ]

To: UCANSEE2
IF Danielle would have been in the MH between 02/01/02 and 02/03/02, the dogs should have detected that. They didn't

This was part of testimony ? An expert opined this ? What exactly did he say because I am surprised anyone would claim to prove a negative.

150 posted on 07/22/2002 4:37:02 PM PDT by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson