[VRWC_minion]

IF Danielle would have been in the MH between 02/01/02 and 02/03/02, the dogs should have detected that. They didn't.

You agree she was in the RV then ?

[UCANSEE2]

You agree she was in the RV then ?

Fingerprints are the evidence I have accepted that show that , at some time, Danielle had been in the MH.

The 'blood' and hair evidence are no proof at all. I can explain a scenario where her hair and 'DNA' (blood) could be in the MH and yet she never entered it.

Wanna know how ?

Danielle , according to the lack of a hit by tracking dogs, had not been in the MH for approximately 2 weeks before the dogs searched it.