2nd Bug Expert Bolsters Westerfield Defense: (Dusek Melting Down Before Juries Eyes!!)

NBC/San Diego ^ | July 22, 2002 | NBC/San Diego

[John Jamieson]

IF IT BLEEDS, IT LEADS = motto of SD Press and CourtTV.

[fatima]

bump

[Freedom2specul8]

Well, if you are talking outside of jury's eyes and ears that's a completely different story...

[Greg Weston]

Do you think Westerfield was too drunk to remember the "dirty dancing" with Brenda? Think that's why he didn't mention it in the interview with the cops?? LOL!!!!!!

[Spunky]

What's the matter no comment on the police interview where Westerfield says absolutely nothing about dancing with Brenda?

I did comment. Read #723

You are correct above. In the transcript Westerfield said absolutely nothing about dancing with Brenda. HE ALSO NEVER SAID HE DIDN'T DANCE WITH HER BECAUSE SHE WASN'T HIS TYPE, in the transcript you posted like you tried to say he said.

[Southflanknorthpawsis]

You must type English to me if you want my response.

[pyx]

Oh OK have it your way. Westerfield didn't deny it,

ROFLAMO

[Dave_in_Upland]

So you think Westerfield is innocent?

I think that the DA has failed to prove many points needed to find DW guilty. I am not sure if he is innocent, but I am sure that I would vote 'Not Proven' Too many holes in the prosecution's case. Too many unanswered questions and questionable police work. And being a 54 year old man who occasionally imbibes in Rum mixed with Coke, and being somewhat overweight, I am sure that after having a few there is no way that I could sneak into a neighbor's home, sealthly abduct their daughter, cross a street, hide her, then transfer her to a motor home in broad daylight, then drive to places where there would be people that I knew and who would expect me to be open and sociable.

[demsux]

You are correct above. In the transcript Westerfield said absolutely nothing about dancing with Brenda. HE ALSO NEVER SAID HE DIDN'T DANCE WITH HER BECAUSE SHE WASN'T HIS TYPE, in the transcript you posted like you tried to say he said.

Now I am not impressed by his sourcing.

[Greg Weston]

>>>Westerfield said absolutely nothing about dancing with Brenda<<<

And why would he do that when asked who he danced with? Was he embarrassed about dancing with someone who "isn't his type"? Too drunk to remember? Why?

[juzcuz]

Detective Tomsovic--June 18/Afternoon

Q: Were there missing parts to Danielle?
1A: Yes. The right foot was almost entirely missing.
LARGE portions of the flesh was missing from her arms, her legs, her torso.
9A Yes. and various things were found, small bits of flesh were found in the brush and shrubbery around the body.
11 Hair, which appeared to be from Danielle, was found quite a distance from the body, in some instances up to 80,90 feet away. There were marks on the ground, kind of greasy drag marks that looked like flesh. Decomposed flesh could have caused that type of activity.

28 15 feet North of where the body was --had been laying they were clumps of hair in Photo..........-- Photograph "E" depitcts a typical greasy spot on the ground where it appears that at one time flesh had lain.


I guess most of you have read Det. Tomsovic's test. I had not, I find it interesting that clumps of Danielle's hair was found 80-90feet North of where her body was found. It seems that she was not only missing her left foot, but her right foot was almost entirely missing. And the drag marks--Greasy??? drag marks??? Pieces of flesh found in the shrubbery????

[Freedom2specul8]

Something else we forgot about.

http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/metro/danielle/transcripts/20020624-9999-pm1.html

Q: NOW I'M SPECIFICALLY DIRECTING YOUR ATTENTION TO -- I'M MARKING ON MINE SO YOU SEE IT AND I SEE IT ON YOURS.A: M-HM.Q: AND YOU INDICATED I NOTED ONE WHITE HAIR. I'M SORRY. IS THAT WORD WAVY?A: YES.Q: BETWEEN DRIVER'S SEAT AND DOOR ON FLOOR. PERIOD. CORRECT?A: YES. Q: POSSIBLY AN ANIMAL HAIR, CORRECT?A: YES. THAT'S WHAT I WROTE. THAT'S CORRECT.Q: AND THAT'S WHAT IT WAS, RIGHT?A: NO. IT TURNED OUT ON FURTHER EXAMINATION THAT IT WAS NOT AN ANIMAL HAIR.Q: WHAT WAS IT?A: IT WAS A HUMAN HAIR. AND IT APPEARED TO BE A PUBIC HAIR.

[Freedom2specul8]

http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/metro/danielle/transcripts/20020624-9999-pm1.html

Q: AND YOU NOTE 80C AS BETWEEN THE DRIVER'S SEAT AND DOOR AS POSSIBLY AN ANIMAL HAIR, IS THAT RIGHT?A: WE'RE NOT TALKING ABOUT 82 NOW?Q: I'M SHOWING IT AS 80C.A: NO. 80C IS ACTUALLY A BLOND HAIR THAT WAS COLLECTED FROM THE DRIVER'S-SIDE FOOTWELL.Q: AGAIN I'M SORRY, WHAT WAS THAT NUMBER?

[Greg Weston]

I'm not impressed with your dodging of the question. Afraid it makes DW look bad that he didn't mention the "dirty dancing" with Brenda when asked directly who he danced with?

[Rheo]

I'm missing the point you are trying to make??

[Jaded]

And?

Danielle didn't have pubic hair.

[connectthedots]

Their asses are going to get a major kicking in the next 3-4 weeks. There is not a single judge in Clark County that will hear a case in which I am involved.

[Rheo]

Thanks for pulling that....that is what the testimony was today before they went to sidebar...and then a discussion about the tape from the media at Dehesa.

I'm not sure what it is all about.

[John Jamieson]

OK, so what's the point?

[Politicalmom]

In case you didn't notice, he was continuing to talk, and Redden INTERRUPTED him. You have NO idea what he might have said otherwise.