To: All
Detective Tomsovic--June 18/Afternoon
Q: Were there missing parts to Danielle?
1A: Yes. The right foot was almost entirely missing.
LARGE portions of the flesh was missing from her arms, her legs, her torso.
9A Yes. and various things were found, small bits of flesh were found in the brush and shrubbery around the body.
11 Hair, which appeared to be from Danielle, was found quite a distance from the body, in some instances up to 80,90 feet away. There were marks on the ground, kind of greasy drag marks that looked like flesh. Decomposed flesh could have caused that type of activity.
28 15 feet North of where the body was --had been laying they were clumps of hair in Photo..........-- Photograph "E" depitcts a typical greasy spot on the ground where it appears that at one time flesh had lain.
I guess most of you have read Det. Tomsovic's test. I had not, I find it interesting that clumps of Danielle's hair was found 80-90feet North of where her body was found. It seems that she was not only missing her left foot, but her right foot was almost entirely missing. And the drag marks--Greasy??? drag marks??? Pieces of flesh found in the shrubbery????
751 posted on
07/22/2002 10:37:28 PM PDT by
juzcuz
To: juzcuz
Thanks for pulling that....that is what the testimony was today before they went to sidebar...and then a discussion about the tape from the media at Dehesa.
I'm not sure what it is all about.
758 posted on
07/22/2002 10:42:19 PM PDT by
Rheo
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson