Skip to comments.
2nd Bug Expert Bolsters Westerfield Defense: (Dusek Melting Down Before Juries Eyes!!)
NBC/San Diego ^
| July 22, 2002
| NBC/San Diego
Posted on 07/22/2002 3:02:31 PM PDT by FresnoDA
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 581-600, 601-620, 621-640 ... 1,621-1,635 next last
To: demsux
Thanks. I don't mind people disagreeing. But I am showing why I have my opinion. I do not appreciate being informed I am LYING when I am basing my comment on testimony.
To: Jrabbit
See cyncooper's posts for info on THE MEDIA TAPE.
To: John Jamieson
"tons of physical evidence" that will fit nicely in a thimble and $3.50 worth of dirty pictures do not prove murder.Enough fingerprints, DNA, fibers, laundry receipts etc could fit in a thimble to prove a dozen murders.
To: connectthedots
>>>The defense council then asked if there was any physical evidence tying the defendant to the crime scene and the answer was "NO". Case over!!<<<
That's all there was to it huh? I'd like to know the particulars of this case.
>>>The general concensus amongst forensic experts is "YES".<<<
In every single case huh? I doubt this. The room I'm sitting in right now if a kid was sleeping on the couch right behind me I could walk right in off the street and take him or her away in 1 minute. If I'm not spitting or bleeding, do not shed any hair of anykind and are wearing gloves what evidence am I going to leave behind??
To: Southflanknorthpawsis
I don't know why the pics are not showing...I can see them just fine.
605
posted on
07/22/2002 9:27:40 PM PDT
by
Rheo
To: Travis McGee
CHILD RAPE VIDEO CLIPS.THAT is one of the things that hasn't been proven! He is charged with that, but let's wait and see what the jury says...YOU didn't see it.
BTW, why don't you go back and read some TESTIMONY instead of quoting Bob and Tom, or whomever you are quoting...your responses don't even come close to testimony, so you are making an a** of yourself.
606
posted on
07/22/2002 9:27:41 PM PDT
by
demsux
To: JudyB1938
LOL......usually they download on the thread just fine, but every once in awhile I get the dreaded Red X.
To: John Jamieson
Perhaps his 'cleanup program' got as far as getting rid of his DVDs and he didn't have time to get to the computer. It's hard to remember EVERYTHING to clean up when committing a murder. You might wipe every print off an RV, and miss Danielle's prints on a cabinet back of the bed....
Again: how many of YOUR friends download 100s of kiddie porn pics, including VIOLENT CHILD RAPE CLIPS?
To: Travis McGee
"Your dogmatic insistence as to his guilt does you no credit." And you could say the same thing about the DW not guilty crowd , but I must say this. My viewpoint (and many others too) is that the prosecution so far has not proven DW guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. They haven't even come close. This is, I feel, a reasonably well informed opinion. I have no idea what the jury will actually decide.
If I am wrong, I am wrong. If tomorrow evidence was presented that showed DW was guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, I would be as insistent they punish him to the maximum extent of the law as you.
If, tomorrow, the produce info showing he is NOT GUILTY, beyond a shadow of a doubt, WHAT WILL YOU DO ?
To: Jaded
Dusek wants to bring in Goff and expects the jury to believe him. Dusek can't have it both ways. Maybe GoFf has told Dusek that he can't refute the testimony of Faulkner and Haskell and the hearing tomorrow is for a motion to dismiss the charges against DW.
To: John Jamieson
PS: You can't just waltz into an XXX Video store and say, "oh BTW, where do you keep your
VIOLENT CHILD RAPE VIDEOS??"That's why he downloaded them. Just click over to Holland and find them free on the internet.
To: FresnoDA
Really? Because a paid expert says the flies were there at a certain time? Gee, the Dream Team said a gang of drug dealers killed Nicole and Ron because her friend was on drugs, therefore............!
To: cyncooper
I'd be a bit more pleasant if you didn't keep bringing up that dead horse we have to keep beating every night. Try and read the woman's testimony and comprehend what it means. Give it a real try and maybe you will understand this time. All those orange fibers "COULD BE FROM THE SAME SOURCE." Got it? COULD! That means maybe they are, and maybe not. Several other people understand it, and I know you can, too.
And what difference does it make anyway? The child was all over his house on cookie day. Those orange fibers mean diddly squat. They don't put the two of them together the weekend she disappeared.
To: Travis McGee
focusing on KIDDIE PORN and actual VIOLENT CHILD RAPE VIDEOS.That is absolutely AMAZING, TM. Funny that's not in the transcripts. The transcripts are on the UT site. Read them.
614
posted on
07/22/2002 9:33:15 PM PDT
by
Jaded
To: Travis McGee
Amen! And so let the child rapist DW burn in hell forever for what he did!
What a jerk!
615
posted on
07/22/2002 9:33:26 PM PDT
by
It's me
To: UCANSEE2
>>>DW's story stayed the same,<<
Westerfield denied dancing with Brenda who "wasn't his type". How does this jibe with the "dirty dancing" stuff? Is Westerfield going to get on the stand and say he was lying about not dancing with her?
To: Jrabbit
That would be funny. Dusek would have a litter of kittens in the court room!!
617
posted on
07/22/2002 9:34:09 PM PDT
by
Jaded
To: cyncooper
I don't mind people disagreeing. But I am showing why I have my opinion. I do not appreciate being informed I am LYING when I am basing my comment on testimony. You are right. It is a matter of interpretation. You see it one way, other people another.
Now if the expert had said "AN EXACT MATCH" there would be no squabble.
Do you know why she didn't? Because she can't. The reasons for this have been gone over and over too.
SO, the TESTIMONY says SIMILAR, right? And that is as close as they can LEGALLY SAY.
To: VRWC_minion
"My intial thoughts were than most of those would be shed while sleeping and your head is in contact with a pillow or while bathing. But so as not to argue my point to much I settled on agreeing that the average would be 1 every 15 minutes. Because even if its ten times that amount the probability she lost it when she was playing there is next to impossible."
I don't see what you could base such an opinion on, minion. If she played in the MH, prior to Feb. 1st - even if we knew the rate at which she dropped hair - we have no way of knowing the duration of her stay, or her specific activities, during that time.
For example, if she ran her fingers through her hair, or jumped up and down upon the bed, that would likely account for increased probability of her leaving hair behind.
Lacking specifics, I don't think anyone can make an accurate prediction of what her lose would have been. JMO.
To: cyncooper; UCANSEE2; Amore; Valpal1; redlipstick
CAN SOMEONE NOT BRING FORTH THE LIGHT OF TRUTH IN THIS VOID, THIS DARKNESS?
Was that drama or what?
uCANsee2, I submit yet another new word!!!
~DRAMAQUEENJACKAL~: A person who either over-dramatizes the subject, or falsely accuses someone else of lying and INTENT is never proven by the dramaqueenjackal.. They ironically confuse lying, with being mistaken. They assume they can read into the hearts and minds of seriously dedicated followers of the PEOPLE VS WESTERFIELD case.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 581-600, 601-620, 621-640 ... 1,621-1,635 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson