Posted on 07/22/2002 3:02:31 PM PDT by FresnoDA
Attorneys are NOT allowed to lie to the jury, the judge, or to anyone. Attorneys can be (and are) subject to discipline for this behavior. But the jury is not allowed to consider the attorneys in their evaluation of the case. Are you not listening to what I've been explaining?
So you have condemned Westerfield BEFORE all evidence has been brought forward? You should never make a judgement based on feelings alone.
If Westerfield is guilty, he should fry - but if per chance he is innocent, should he still fry in order to make us all feel better knowing that someone is going to pay for this crime?
I have not yet been convinced by the defense that the man is guilty. I have spots of all sorts of DNA from my children and their friends - God forbid that any thing bad happen to them!
I find the parents conduct appalling. I want to see DW acquitted because he didn't kill Danielle. I don't give a rip about the parents or whether they are "punished."
Not arguing that. Apparently some want to take this experts opinion and put it on the same level as DNA testing. I don't think that its that exact and if its not that exact one could arive at different conclusions using the same data and still be considered to be giving a valid opinion.
When the other evidence strongly suggests that Danielle was in the MH and their is no reasonable explanation (I don't buy the snuck in to play one for several reasons) and that Danielle has fibers on her that belong to Westerfield, I think the experts testimony contradicts facts and his opinion must be wrong.
While it is true that the level of sophisticated measures for bugs isn't upto the level of DNA, you CAN note the lifespan of those bugs, note the signs of successive generations, and note the signs on the dead body. The lifespan and habits of these bugs can be readily reproduced in a lab and can be observed in the wild. Even assuming these guys are off 50% stills makes it difficult for the prosecution.
Also, as far as the evidence in the MH goes - we know that Brenda and Damon weren't always checking on the kids. An open motor home would be an inviting place to check out for elementary school kids.
IMHO, that is.
FRegards,
PrairieDawg
LOL!
So, you are an entomologist ? An expert? You have spent years studying the life cycles of these particular insects and their invasion of a host for reproductive purpose ?
Unless of course the OJ jury has been reincarnated.
Funny how everyone that gets on these threads and hasn't "SEEMED" to have spent enough time to be informed of all the evidence, all the testimony, KEEPS REFERRING to the OJ CASE. Like that proves something by them using those words.
Just this a-holes actions that weekend are weird enough to point to him.
Do you have some specific facts you wish to refer to that have not been covered in testimony where it was determined that this those actions were normal and reasonable?
I understand your opinion, and that you believe he is guilty. Do you think he should be allowed to have a trial? That he should be allowed to finish it before a jury convicts him ?
Just wondering .
I'm really confused now...how can you be so convinced that DW is guilty if you haven't followed the trial?
You have read the transcripts, right?
I suspect some "similarities" with the Samantha case.
Yeah, sure thing, sweetie (wink wink nudge nudge).
But the jury is not allowed to consider the attorneys in their evaluation of the case.
If either attorney has been caught lying, then that behavior should be open for jury consideration, because that raises the question of "and what ELSE are they lying about? How did they hire the expert witnesses, what evidence are they hiding, how are they shading the testimony?"
But some folks think that this is a good thing and should be as zealously punished as it currently is (wink wink nudge nudge chuckle chuckle).
Are you not listening to what I've been explaining?
Forgive me for saying this, but you sound like you've drunk too much of the legal system Kool-Aid to realize what you've said.
That, like everything else stated so far by Poohbah that I can see, is just his opinion.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.