[willyone]

I have no idea. I have not been following the trial except for every now and then. Like I have posted before it has been so dry here that insects would be in a race against the body mummifying first. I put more weight in the forensic evidence and some of Westerfields actions. I am just glad she was not anyone I knew and that I am not on the jury. If the prosecution can prove beyond a reasonable doubt fine, if not then that is just the way it is.

[Rheo]

I have not been following the trial except for every now and then.

I'm really confused now...how can you be so convinced that DW is guilty if you haven't followed the trial?

You have read the transcripts, right?

[Dave_in_Upland]

I have no idea. I have not been following the trial except for every now and then.

It shows. Your lack of knowledge of this case reeks. A more mature person would at least understand the facts before debating them

[UCANSEE2]

I have no idea. I have not been following the trial except for every now and then.

And THE ABOVE is the most commonly heard statement from those that get on the threads, INSIST that DW is GUILTY, and that anyone that doesn't believe them is an IDIOT (or worse).

I would like to Thank you, WILLYONE, for at least being honest enough to admit this. ALL of the other posters on here would be happy to help point you to information, links, testimony, or answer your questions, to help you get the information you need, to then make an INFORMED CONCLUSION. Whatever that ends up being, it ends up.