Posted on 07/21/2002 8:13:11 PM PDT by Ready2go
Traficant juror changes his mind; now convinced conviction was wrong
07/20/02
Sabrina Eaton and John Caniglia Plain Dealer Reporters
Washington
- A juror who helped convict U.S. Rep. James Traficant says his vote to find the Youngstown congressman guilty of 10 felonies in April was a mistake. He says he changed his mind after watching televised testimony before a House ethics panel this week.
"I know it's after the fact, but now I believe that there's no doubt that the government was out to get him, and if they want you, they'll find enough evidence to make you believe that the Earth is flat," said Leo Glaser of Independence, who was juror No. 8 at Traficant's nine-week trial in Cleveland.
Glaser, 54, said he was swayed by the testimony of Richard Detore, a Virginia executive accused of bribing Traficant. Detore, who faces trial in October, chose not to testify in Traficant's trial because he could have hurt his own case. But he did give his version to a House ethics panel that later recommended that Traficant be tossed from his job.
Detore told the panel he hadn't tried to bribe Traficant and that the chief prosecutor in the case against Traficant, Assistant U.S. Attorney Craig Morford, urged him to fabricate a story to say he overheard Traficant seeking favors from Youngstown businessman John J. Cafaro in exchange for political influence. He said his refusal to lie about Traficant resulted in his own indictment.
Morford, who was unable to present his side of the story when Detore testified in Washington, yesterday categorically denied "any improper conduct" and said Traficant brought up the same allegations last year in legal motions that were rejected by Judge Lesley Wells. He declined to comment on Glaser's statements.
Under federal law, Glaser's change of heart won't change the verdict against Traficant. Although it's unusual for jurors to change their minds after a trial, Case Western University law professor and political scientist Jonathan Entin said Traficant probably won't succeed if he tries to use Glaser's reversal to appeal the verdict, because Detore voluntarily refused to testify in Cleveland.
Madison Republican Rep. Steve LaTourette, a member of the ethics panel that recommended Traficant's expulsion on Thursday, said that Glaser contacted his office several weeks ago to discuss the case but that ethics committee lawyers barred him from talking to the juror because of his role in deciding Traficant's fate.
LaTourette said he'll ask Speaker Dennis Hastert to bring Glaser's concerns to the attention of the House of Representatives before it decides whether to eject Traficant next week.
Another ethics committee member, Cleveland Democrat Stephanie Tubbs Jones, said she wasn't sure how Glaser's statements would affect Traficant's case.
"He's certainly not the first juror to reconsider his decision after a trial," Tubbs Jones said.
Glaser, who came to public attention when a Cleveland judge dismissed a traffic citation he was issued while trying to feed a homeless man during the 1996 holiday season, said he would have voted to acquit Traficant of all charges if Detore had testified at the bribery and racketeering trial.
"It would have given me reasonable doubt," said Glaser, a design technician at the Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. who has twice run for mayor of Independence.
But other jurors said the evidence, with or without Detore's story, buried Traficant. Traficant's employees said he made them give kickbacks from their salaries and do unpaid work on his farm and boat. Local contractors said they gave Traficant bribes in exchange for assistance. Wells is scheduled to sentence Traficant on July 30.
"There was just so much evidence in the case and so many witnesses that the wealth of information against [Traficant] was overwhelming," said Jeri Zimmerman, a juror from Mentor. "I kept saying to myself, 'Please, please show me something, anything, that would make me wonder.' But [Traficant] never did. And the witnesses he called hurt him more than helped him."
Asked about Detore's testimony before the panel, Zimmerman said: "That's one person. What about the other 50 people that we saw? The government's case was overwhelming."
To reach this Plain Dealer reporter:
seaton@plaind.com, 216-999-4212
© 2002 The Plain Dealer. Used with permission. » Send This Page | » Print This Page MORE NEWS
1). A former secret service agent speaking out in favor of Traficant when he has a lot more to gain by being quiet.
2). A witness that says that had he heard this agents testimony, testimony the judge in the trial would not allow in, he would not have voted to convict.
Forget the pointless matter of whether I will get over it or not. Blather is not a substitute for a well supported position. Please, what do you have on this? What is the overwhelming evidence?
That is a pretty broad statement. You need to back this up. There are a lot of people that have run across the IRS and had to pay them. This hardly rises to the level of the charges you leveled against Traficant in your original post.
This is correct. I lived in Youngstown when Traficant was elected to Congress. And 60 Minutes did a story about him, showing that after his acquittal, the IRS came after the money, leaving him the poorest congressman on capital hill. His first few years, he lived on a leaking houseboat he rented there. The man doesn't have a lot of money, was never a power player. Not the brightest guy, but not an intentional crook (in his history) either.
I frankly don't care about the case anymore. It won't even bother me if you deem my lack of interest a victory for your position. Feel free.
Democrats have been hounding him for more than 20 years. Part of Traficant's problems began when he was Sherrif, where he had very public and long-standing differences of opinion with the chairman of the Mahoning Valley Democratic organization (Don Hanni, who still owns the chair). It was surmised at the time that this may have had something to do with his original charges, but no links were ever officially drawn.
No one is trying to bait you into anything. Please excuse me, I thought this was a discussion board.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.