Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Bashed by Clinton-Gore Tag Team
NewsMax.com ^ | 7/20/02 | Carl Limbacher and NewsMax.com Staff

Posted on 07/20/2002 6:34:59 PM PDT by kattracks

President Bush's decision to order his Justice Department not to prosecute Bill Clinton and Al Gore despite stark evidence of criminality is coming back to haunt him, with the Democratic duo taking turns this weekend bashing him on the economy before enthusiastic crowds.

Headlining a fund-raiser in Oregon Friday night, ex-President Clinton accused President Bush of badly mishandling the economy, complaining that Republicans have squandered the prosperity he worked so hard to achieve while forcing poor and middle-income people to shoulder an unfair burden by granting tax breaks to the rich.

"The Republicans took us from the biggest surplus in history back to a deficit," Clinton railed before a cheering audience of 850 who gathered to support two statewide candidates.

One of the candidates, Rep. Darlene Hooley, introduced the ex-president saying, "Are you better off two years ago under Bill Clinton than you are today?" the Associated Press said.

A few hours later on Saturday, Vice President Al Gore delivered a similar message to a Tennessee audience, some of which seemed coordinated with the Clinton speech.

The Bush administration has "lied about the future liabilities they have put on our shoulders as taxpayers," Gore complained, before adding, "I don't care what anybody says. I think Bill Clinton and I did a damn good job."

Like his former boss, Gore cited mounting red ink in the federal budget and predicted that a coming economic downturn would lead to "bigger deficits than when the first Bush was there."

Gore called on the Bush administration to "completely scrap its economic plan and its team on Monday ... start over from scratch and start rebuilding this economy," the AP said.

Read more on this subject in related Hot Topics:

Al Gore
Bush Administration
Clinton Scandals



TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-107 next last
To: Wait4Truth
It's the idiot sheeple we have to worry about.
21 posted on 07/20/2002 7:02:31 PM PDT by Paul Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Wait4Truth
I see your intense anger and hatred and I raise you 100 times.
22 posted on 07/20/2002 7:02:32 PM PDT by ladyinred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
Whatever happened to the gentlemens' rule that ex-presidents more or less kept their mouths shut about their successors with only rare exceptions?

And especially at a time when the country is at war, and preparing for more.

Nothing matters to the clinton/gore slime, other than the power they crave.

23 posted on 07/20/2002 7:02:44 PM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SoCar
You and I have a lot in common!
24 posted on 07/20/2002 7:02:44 PM PDT by Wait4Truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
If the Bush team isn't thinking right now, "These freakin' gloves are comin' off, baby," then maybe he doesn't have the 'fire in the belly' for a second term. The dems are starting to smell blood in the water.
25 posted on 07/20/2002 7:02:48 PM PDT by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
One of the candidates, Rep. Darlene Hooley, introduced the ex-president saying, "Are you better off two years ago under Bill Clinton than you are today?" the Associated Press said.

Well, I guess a few White House interns and other assorted bimbos were better off under Bill Clinton, but the rest of us sure weren't!!!

And, guess what, I AM better off than I was two years ago...I have a better job, my kids' school has improved since they stopped all the Clintonoid PC crap, my credit card and HELOC interest rates have gone down, and my house has appreciated by over $100,000. All that, plus I don't have to cover my kids' ears when the news readers are talking about the President of the United States!!!

Dems R Losers.

26 posted on 07/20/2002 7:04:44 PM PDT by Dems_R_Losers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny
Isn't it ironic that they are in destroy-the-Republican mode at the same time Ann Coulter's book is out?
27 posted on 07/20/2002 7:05:10 PM PDT by Paul Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Irrelevant people. Meaningless comments.
28 posted on 07/20/2002 7:05:47 PM PDT by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
With the Stock Market tanking,

This can't go on much longer. The worst is long since over; the Dow is not going to go to zero. Things will long since have stabilized, and probably risen, by November, allowing the sheeple to forget about it.

GWB caving on ICC,

He has not caved on ICC. He just let them change the language a little so the EUnuchs could save face. Our citizens and soldiers remain 100% as protected from the ICC as Bush promised they would be.

GWB wobbling on many other issues,

Too vague for me to respond.

The War on Terrorism seemingly turning into a PC War,

I've said it before and I'll say it again: The fact that airport screeners are only searching white guys and 85-year-old women is only because they're doing it in front of the public. The FBI, CIA and NSI aren't playing that game. No matter what they might be saying to the media, they're looking for pissed-off, ultra-religious young Arab males with unsavory connections. And I don't think Bush is going to invade Canada instead of Iraq.

GWB is facing serious problems not only in 2002 election but also in the 2004 election. If GWB can't show some serious improvement, especially in the economy/stocks by 2002, he could easily find himself faced with a Democratically controlled Capitol Hill (both chambers).

If there's another major terrorist attack and/or we invade Iraq before Election day, the Congressional Elections are in the bag for us. The RATS will not be able to resist putting their foots in their mouths in either case, making constant unpatriotic, special-interest-group-loving statements, and just generally acting in a fifth column sort of way that will drive most voters running and screaming to the GOP side. And like I said above, the stock market's going to be old news by November. Also, the economy itself is improving quite well and quite rapidly. It's just the stock market that's an aberration. That will have to correct itself sooner rather than later. Remember, we still have four months. And it's completely useless to even think about 2004 at this point. How many of us on Jan 20, 2001 expected anything but four years of intense partisan infighting with the public split almost 50-50 and incredibly angry about almost everything? Instead we ended up with Bush's approval ratings over 90% within nine months and a total implosion of every tactic the RATS have tried against him thus far. ANYTHING can happen.

And by 2004 we very well could see a President Al or more likely a President Hillary.

Again, something I've said a million times and will say again: Why do so many Freepers see President Hillary as a mandate from God, a metaphysical inevitability? She's nothing without the powers of the White House to protect her but a power-mad bitch. She could never ever win most states; the only reason she even won New York is because it has a ton of hardcore RAT voters, welcomes carpetbaggers and because Giuliani dropped out and ended up being replaced by a guy who looked about 22, often acted like it, and campaigned as if he'd inherited his entire advisory team from the Dole '96 fiasco. None of that's going to happen to her on a presidential campaign level.

29 posted on 07/20/2002 7:05:59 PM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
True but...you don't go down to their level eithr. I have faith in President Bush. He is trustworthy and good. All I can think of when I see Gore is at the one debate when he jumped off the stool in his cowboy boots and started over to George Bush. Was so assinine on Gore's part but so cool on Bush's part when he just looked at Gore up one side and downt he other...hesitated for a moment and pressed on leaving ole Gore standing there with his foot in his mouth. Which reminds me...remember when Gore and Clinton were on stage for something with Tipper and Hillary and both Prez and Vice had on jeans??? What a farce and what a joke.
30 posted on 07/20/2002 7:06:36 PM PDT by cubreporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
You said it right at #7.
31 posted on 07/20/2002 7:07:09 PM PDT by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
Right on and cleverly said...Bush is going to "new tone" himself into being a one-term president.

Right on. However, his new tone is the right tone. It is a decent tone. It is a good tone.

A political strategist smarter than me must have a clue as what to do. I don't. What to do?

Answer sharply? Appear above and and don't answer? What to do?

32 posted on 07/20/2002 7:07:09 PM PDT by joyful1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Sigh. Now it begins...

Thanks for the post...I think. Material of this sort containing actual Clinton/Gore quotes should be tagged 'ELBA' - the Extinction Level Barf Alert.

1. It can be demonstrated that the market downturn is the natural cyclical response to bottoming long term interest rates. They peaked in 1981 and the classic head-and-shoulders pattern extending over four decades is now playing out. The bull market of the '90s is over. This is a massive secular change.

2. This behavior of the equities has precious little to do either with Bubba Rex or Bush. But the chattering class will say otherwise.

3. What begins now? Huh? Why, of course, the howl, the banshee wailing from the bastards in the media that Bush the Younger is doom incarnate. We have two years of this ahead of us. Once this Goebbelsian process has run its course, the media numbed voter will bring them, the doublespeaking democrats, back to office.

4. Bush's low profile let's-move-on strategy will ultimately undo him...and us. My overarching fear is that Hillary Regina will pull out all the stops; she knows her time is limited and she will target a VPOTUS slot with Gore's rival (TBA). This is going to be a frightfully interesting couple of years.

Blessings to Freepers Everywhere.
33 posted on 07/20/2002 7:08:15 PM PDT by esopman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides; ladyinred; cubreporter
Paul, you are correct about having to worry about the sheeple - but isn't that where WE come in? Don't we have to do more than sit at our computers and whine? Don't we have to fight back? Are we going to allow these slimeball traitors beat us? I hope not. I worked hard for Bush the last time and I will do so again. Anyone that says there is no difference between Bush and the RATS is on some serious drugs.

Lady, my blood pressure is WAY up to see these traitors dare to call President Bush and his Administration "liars"! Those b*astards invented the word "liar"...oh, I better stop...I dearly want to forget about using asterisks in cuss words! All I know is we cannot let this stand! Battle plans must be prepared.

34 posted on 07/20/2002 7:08:36 PM PDT by Wait4Truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
"It will be interesting to see an emboldened Hillary blow Al out of the water in '04. As much as I hate to think of Hillary running, it would be poetic justice for him to get a knife in the back from the Clintons."

You can count on that occuring. And let's not forget Tiny Tom and Slick Dick. They also have designs on The White House.

35 posted on 07/20/2002 7:09:29 PM PDT by blackbart.223
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: cubreporter
You know, with all this criticism of W and the economy, I cannot help but think of the media and Dim shrieking of Bush "talking down the economy" a few months ago, during the recession. According to them, the President was committing treason by acknowledging that there was a recession.
36 posted on 07/20/2002 7:09:31 PM PDT by Paul Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
Caving in on ICC--only for a year will they stay n foreign land with guarantee that US soldiers are spared from this silly rul and they will renegotiate. Believe me GWB would never succumb to ICC, but Clinton did.

Let me see, the malfeasance of the corporate world was happening during the Clinton administration but no one was investigating. Now the good guys are doing their duty and they have said many times " the mess they were left with." During Clinton, The SEC had not gotten any new funding, World com books had not been looked at, Enron was considered most desired corporations with junkets to India and the US footing the bill for some of its projects.

Why is it that Pitt ( in less than year he has been at SEC) has gotten more big corporations' books looked at--B/C no one had been doing it before.

Everything in the 1990s was so good--everybody was making money but alas, all ponzi schemes must come to an end.
37 posted on 07/20/2002 7:09:40 PM PDT by olliemb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Wait4Truth
Next look for Algore to rip out that old leaky sink in his rundown ill-maintained rental property and claim it had been mis-installed by ..ah... ah.. Bush & Cheney Plumbing.. yah.. Bush & Cheney ... that's the ticket.

Clinton and Gore left such a mess, which the media didn't report, being too busy spinning and marching to Slick's lies, as if they were music.

38 posted on 07/20/2002 7:10:16 PM PDT by A. Morgan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
Bush is going to "new tone" himself into being a one-term president.

That seems to be your desire.

39 posted on 07/20/2002 7:11:00 PM PDT by rdb3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: joyful1
If he was dealing with a blithering idiot, like Ann Richards, I would say keep the new tone. However, he is dealing with two Arkansas GANGSTERS. Remember Sean Connery's speech in The Untouchables about dealing with the mob.
40 posted on 07/20/2002 7:11:38 PM PDT by Paul Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-107 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson