Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A war against the American people
TownHall.com ^ | Friday, July 19, 2002 | by Paul Craig Roberts

Posted on 07/18/2002 10:03:53 PM PDT by JohnHuang2

During the Cold War, when the United States faced a really dangerous adversary capable of incinerating our entire country in 30 minutes, we kept to our principles, stressing the virtues of a free society over Soviet communism.

The Cold War must have sapped our strength. Now, faced with Muslim terrorists who are nothing in comparison to Soviet ICBMs, we have adopted the methods of our former communist adversaries. The Bush administration is putting in place the neighborhood informant system used by the infamous Stasi, the communist East German secret police.

Bush's plan, known as TIPS, Terrorism Information and Prevention System, intends to turn one out of every 24 Americans into a government spy reporting on their fellow citizens.

The results in the United States will be the same as in East Germany. Jealousies, rivalries, misperceptions and inflamed imaginations will result in the reporting of many innocent people, who will be investigated, questioned, detained and, on occasion, framed.

Conservative gun owners will be likely targets of anti-gun liberals. Hunters will be reported by animal rights activists. Career rivals and rivals for the attention of a member of the opposite sex will be tempted to nudge each other out of contention with "suspicious activity" reports.

The irresponsible American media will make mountains out of molehills. As hysteria mounts, more people will feel a patriotic duty to report their neighbors. Jokes, protests, comparisons to the Stasi will all become evidence of disloyalty.

The war against terrorism has just begun, and already it has turned into a war against the American people. The U.S. government's fear of its own citizens first manifested itself in "airport security." Everyone is subject to warrantless and unreasonable searches. Regular air travelers observe that the vast majority of people searched could not possibly be terrorists, even if their lives depended on it.

Yet, the mass insult of American citizens by their own government continues unabated. Millions of man-hours are wasted standing in lines while the moronic policy of searching feeble elderly couples, young mothers with babies and U.S. military officers wastes taxpayers' dollars.

The Bush administration's assumption is every citizen is a potential terrorist. An entire new federal bureaucracy exists for the purpose of violating the Constitution's prohibition against unreasonable search.

The government's fear of the American people exceeds the ability of bureaucrats to control us. To make sure we are properly watched, the Bush administration is recruiting 12 million Americans to report on their fellows.

What's going on here? Why are 12 million Americans, in addition to thousands of government police agents with unprecedented eavesdropping powers, needed to ferret out the suspected 5,000 terrorists in the United States?

The best complexion that can be put on this is that the U.S. government has realized the insanity of the multicultural-diversity-open-borders-visas-to-all-immigrants-from- everywhere mindset that has turned the United States into a sanctuary for terrorists and illegal aliens. Too cowardly to deal with the immigration issue, the government instead has adopted police-state methods to watch the population.

It is amazing to watch conservatives and patriots cheer on the advent of the Orwellian state. A new bureaucracy will be formed to record suspicious activity reports from the 12 million citizen informants. Once the police state bureaucracy is in place, it will never be dismantled. As Hoover Institution scholar Martin Anderson has pointed out, not even the fearsome Nixon White House was able to abolish a tiny bureaucracy of tea-tasters.

Milton Friedman said that a country cannot have open borders and a welfare state. Even less can a country welcome multicultural immigrants whose loyalties reside elsewhere. Open borders for terrorists means a police state for citizens.

Rome fell when Romans came to view their government's predations as worse than those of the invaders. Will this be America's fate? Will our government do us more harm than the terrorists?


TOPICS: Editorial; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: americanpeople; war
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last
Friday, July 19, 2002

Quote of the Day posted by gunshy

1 posted on 07/18/2002 10:03:53 PM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Sounds like a free pass to the 'peeping toms!'

'Why yes, officer, I saw her put explosives in her panties!'

2 posted on 07/18/2002 10:06:10 PM PDT by rockfish59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Amen
3 posted on 07/18/2002 10:06:24 PM PDT by herewego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
What's going on here? Why are 12 million Americans, in addition to thousands of government police agents with unprecedented eavesdropping powers, needed to ferret out the suspected 5,000 terrorists in the United States?

5,000 does not sound like a lot until you divide them into 4 man hijacking teams. He is correct that 5,000 is a small needle in a very large haystack and that seems to contradict his own position.

4 posted on 07/18/2002 10:09:17 PM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Bush's plan, known as TIPS, Terrorism Information and Prevention System, intends to turn one out of every 24 Americans into a government spy reporting on their fellow citizens

I thought the purpose was a terrorist tip line? So "a fellow citizen" that happens to be a terrorist should be left alone?

5 posted on 07/18/2002 10:12:00 PM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
"It is amazing to watch conservatives and patriots cheer on the advent of the Orwellian state"

I think frightening is a more appropriate way of phrasing it.

6 posted on 07/18/2002 10:12:21 PM PDT by Kerberos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rockfish59
What is being proposed here that is not already available to "peeping toms"?
7 posted on 07/18/2002 10:13:14 PM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
Some people are still stuck in pre-9/11 mode.
8 posted on 07/18/2002 10:15:26 PM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Gramsci understood what Marx did not understand: Economic crises by themselves would not subvert capitalism, because capitalism always managed to overcome the crises and emerged stronger. Another theory was necessary for a different reality. One that recognized the importance of culture and ideology, and methods that went beyond the coarser forms of Marxist class struggle. Methods that would be efficient in capturing power in a western society. Methods that would fit the use of mass media because they were subtle and persuasive. If you gain the minds you gain the bodies. Even a partial victory is useful, because it weakens and diminishes your opposition.

Source

9 posted on 07/18/2002 10:21:57 PM PDT by nunya bidness
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nunya bidness
c'mon now and be a good little spy for the gubmint,
the hill is counting on you!
sarcasm/ off dead and done as most of us say to Hell with spying on others.
10 posted on 07/18/2002 10:29:06 PM PDT by herewego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Kerberos
I think frightening is a more appropriate way of phrasing it.

Other than a spate of hyperbolic headlines what exactly "frightens" you? BTW TIPS will not be implemented good idea or bad.

11 posted on 07/18/2002 10:36:20 PM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: herewego
Who says I'm not already?
12 posted on 07/18/2002 10:43:17 PM PDT by nunya bidness
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: herewego
Tell me, what is stopping you or me from picking up the phone and reporting each other to the FBI with or without "TIPS"?
13 posted on 07/18/2002 10:49:47 PM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
"Tell me, what is stopping you or me from picking up the phone and reporting each other to the FBI with or without "TIPS"?

Common sense and decency I would hope.

14 posted on 07/18/2002 11:01:44 PM PDT by blackbart.223
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: blackbart.223
Bingo.
15 posted on 07/18/2002 11:03:26 PM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
Tell me, what is stopping you or me from picking up the phone and reporting each other to the FBI with or without "TIPS"?

TIPS will obligate a good number of people to make the call.

I'm sure they'll have some Compliance program or another. All good organizations do. It's just Good Corporate Governance these days.

(See your Human Resources commissar for the Papers you must sign, having produced two valid forms of picture ID.)

16 posted on 07/18/2002 11:04:24 PM PDT by Askel5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
"Bingo."

Hot steel on target.

17 posted on 07/18/2002 11:08:12 PM PDT by blackbart.223
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Askel5
TIPS will obligate a good number of people to make the call.

Show me ANY reference to such an "obligation".

18 posted on 07/18/2002 11:09:24 PM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: blackbart.223
Common sense and decency I would hope.


Or maybe you don't need to call ... maybe you think you can do a better job on the flyers you'll paste throughout the area if your daughter goes missing.

What's the point of national media attention and inter-law enforcement agency partnerships if this is the Work Product they offer?

With a straight face, no less.

19 posted on 07/18/2002 11:10:20 PM PDT by Askel5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
Show me ANY reference to such an "obligation".

Does cash for tips count?

Not that I've heard of it yet but that's usually how it works.

20 posted on 07/18/2002 11:11:04 PM PDT by nunya bidness
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson