To: RobRoy
A KITTEN is "walking meat" to you?? You mean a locomotive mammal is "walking meat" to you? It's ok to cook them live?? Wow...sick. Stay away from my dog, bud, or you'll me so much NON-walking meat.
To: cake_crumb
A KITTEN is "walking meat" to you?? You mean a locomotive mammal is "walking meat" to you? It's ok to cook them live??Three questions and three answers:
Yes
Yes
I would a lobster but I wouldn't to a Kitten or chicken or cow - but I wouldn't presume to be able to tell you not to - to your own animal, of course.
80 posted on
07/16/2002 4:41:07 PM PDT by
RobRoy
To: cake_crumb
A KITTEN is "walking meat" to you?? You mean a locomotive mammal is "walking meat" to you? It's ok to cook them live??
To the badass machomen that make these kinds of posts, yep, they are walking meat.
To: cake_crumb; RobRoy; JavaTheHutt; Diamond; Nowhere Man
What is the moral difference between grilling a live kitten and putting a live lobster into a pot of boiling water?
Is it not true that both of these animals will have a similar experience of suffering?
Does the fact that the lobster is to be eaten, while the kitten is to be watched suffering make a difference?
Does a live kitten put on the grill suffer more than a live lobster put in a pot of boiling water?
What is the moral difference between one person who boils a live lobster for the pleasure of watching it suffer and die, and another person who boils a live lobster so he can eat it? In both cases the live lobster being boiled suffers equally.
Would anyone say that it is just as wrong to grill a live cat as it is to boil a live lobster?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson