Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HairOfTheDog; Diddle E. Squat; Lazamataz
If the woman featured in this article had truly cared about the kitten, she'd have snapped its neck as she took it off the grill. I cannot imagine a more painful last day than having been burnt alive and force fed.

It is our obligation to make comfortable and feed human beings, not animals. Animals are DIFFERENT.

Once upon a time, we were sitting around the kitchen table at my grandparents' in Salina. A table at which I'd eaten venison and rabbit (perhaps squirrel) as a kid and from which you can see the backyard where my grandpa used to raise (and slaughter) his own chickens.

My Dad was telling the story of how he'd come home from the municipal pool on a bright sunny day and -- taking the last several steps of the basement stairs at one leap as was his practice -- landed square on the skull of a little white kitten they were keeping in the basement.

The kitten wasn't dead but clearly was suffering. My Dad either snapped its neck or shot it, I can't remember, but put it out of its misery immediately. As is the thing to do -- whether a million dollar race horse, prize pig or precious kitten that meets with misfortune somehow.

I burst into tears. The story was too much for my tender sensibilities and I had to run from the table to go cry my eyes out in the bathroom.

My grandma -- the Kansas housewife -- marched in after me and upbraided me in no uncertain terms. This was a mere animal, not some human being. How could it be I was reduced to maudlin tears over some stupid cat when -- for example -- the story of her own father's being scalded and burned to death by an explosion of hot tar certainly did not elicit such a response.

I was shamed to silence for being corrected thus. But I can assure you I stood there thinking she was cruel and heartless. "Counter-productive" to her cause, if you will.

Still, as it turns out, she was absolutely right. Hers was the trump card of Objective truth while all I held was rank emotion.

112 posted on 07/16/2002 5:12:36 PM PDT by Askel5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]


To: Askel5
I think you might be confusing the relative value of the cat's life (versus a human's) with the seriousness of this guy's action, which was out-and-out cruelty. Whether it was better to try to help the cat or kill it, I guess the latter makes sense, although I don't like seeing that argument extended to terminally ill human beings, fwiw. I do see a difference between hunting an animal for food, experimenting on one to develop life-saving treatments for human beings, and grilling one just to get your sick jollies. We should keep animal life and human life in perspective, I definitely agree with you there, but this guy's action is evil.
125 posted on 07/16/2002 5:25:32 PM PDT by strictlyaminorleaguer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies ]

To: Askel5
Animals are indeed different from us. For one, they have a lot more hair.

However, I don't think the distinction means that it is weakness to deeply care about the ones that have been in our lives, and cry and mourn their suffering or their loss...

My life is richer for caring about them. I happen to think there are an awful lot of things that are worth caring about that are not human beings... I like my way better than yours, and I am not changing.

To say that the woman did not truly care because she did not snap its neck is narrow. Not everyone can do that... not everyone is a Kansas Housewife. She cared in the way she knew how.
129 posted on 07/16/2002 5:27:23 PM PDT by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson