Posted on 07/16/2002 7:40:55 AM PDT by Momaw Nadon
CANBERRA (Reuters) - Scientists searching the stars for aliens are convinced an E.T. is out there -- it's just that they haven't had the know-how to detect such a being.
But now technological advances have opened the way for scientists to check millions of previously unknown star systems, dramatically increasing the chances of finding intelligent life in outer space in the next 25 years, the world's largest private extraterrestrial agency believes.
"We're looking for needles in the haystack that is our galaxy, but there could be thousands of needles out there," Seth Shostak, the senior astronomer at California's non-profit Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence ( news - web sites) (SETI) Institute, told Reuters in an interview on Tuesday.
"If that's the case, with the number of new star systems we now hope to check, we should find one of those in the next 25 years."
But Shostak, visiting Australia to attend a conference on extraterrestrial research, said detecting alien life, like the big-eyed alien in the film E.T., was only the start.
"Even if we detect life out there, we'll still know nothing about what form of life we have detected and I doubt they'll be able -- or want -- to communicate with us," Shostak said.
Since it was founded in 1984, the SETI Institute has monitored radio signals, hoping to pick up a transmission from outer space. Its Project Phoenix conducts two annual three-week sessions on a radio telescope at Arecibo, Puerto Rico.
Project Phoenix, widely seen as the inspiration for the 1997 film "Contact" starring Jodie Foster, which depicted a search for life beyond earth, is the privately funded successor to an original NASA ( news - web sites) program that was canceled in 1993 amid much skepticism by the U.S. Congress.
But the search has been slow. About 500 of 1,000 targeted stars have been examined -- and no extraterrestrial transmissions have been detected.
E.T. NOT ON THE LINE
"We do get signals all the time but when checked out they have all been human made...and are not from E.T., more AT&T," said Shostak.
He said the privately-funded institute was developing a giant US$26 million telescope to start operating in 2005 that can search the stars for signals at least 100 times faster.
The so-called Allen Telescope Array, named after sponsor and Microsoft co-founder Paul Allen, is a network of more than 350, six-meter (20-foot) satellite dishes with a collecting area exceeding that of a 100-meter (338-foot) telescope.
The Allen array, to be built at the Hat Creek Observatory about 290 miles northeast of San Fransciso, will also expand the institute's stellar reconnaissance to 100,000 or even one million nearby stars, searching 24 hours a day, seven days a week.
Shostak said he is convinced there is intelligent life out there -- but don't expect to find a loveable, boggle-eyed E.T..
He said if any aliens share the same carbon-based organic chemistry as humans, they would probably have a central processing system, eyes, a mouth or two, legs and some form of reproduction.
But Shostak thinks any intelligent extraterrestrial life will have gone light years beyond the intelligence of man.
"What we are more likely to hear will be so far beyond our own level that it might not be biological anymore but some artificial form of life," he said. "Don't expect a blobby, squishy alien to be on the end of the line."
I plan to keep going until the creationist inside you comes out. That's my plan- we may both have to live long after our warrenties expire to pull it off though.
Surely, if they have the tech know-how to traverse the galaxy or universe, they could crack our language code, as it were.
Also, assuming it is real, how do you rule-out the possibility that it is a demonic, rather than extra-terrestial phenom? Particularly in light of the fact that it has a quasi-religious aspect.
How do you know your not being decieved?
Brian.
You once gave me a small ray of hope when you conceded that the spectrum of animal fossils between dinosaur and bird forms did seem to show that some kind of morphing change had occurred. My little heart went pitty-pat. "Finally a reasonable creationist!" That was, what, a year ago? Getting to be a dim memory.
I know you don't need my advice, but I never apologize under such circumstances. It always bothers me to see apologies given when they're not justified, as it only gratifies the emotions of a certain kind of bully. The most I'll do under such circumstances is to say: "I regret that you misunderstood the intent of my post. What I was trying to say is this ..."
This does indeed (which is clearly language used by you in a rebuttal attempt on some physics assertion of mine) show that you are manufacturing strawman disagreements for the purpose of insinuating yourself into the shallow appearance of correcting me. Look closely at your choice of words, and contrast them to mine. If you still can't see and admit it, then don't waste my time again. On the other hand, you did use the creative phrase "too-subtle-by-half", leading me to believe that you may be frequently letting the house pets onto the keyboard.
If I posit an outright fantasy and mix it with some real world conditions, when will you return to fantasyland?
Yeah. You better keep it ordinary. You're only allowed so many words!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.