Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Detoxing the Markets: Bears Still Look Hungry
Source: www.thestreet.com ^ | 07/16/2002 | By Peter Eavis

Posted on 07/16/2002 4:50:49 AM PDT by Lazamataz

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-127 next last
To: habs4ever; Lazamataz
If you had bought $1000.00 worth of Nortel stock one year ago, it would now be worth $49.00.

With Enron, you would have $16.50 of the original $1,000.00.

With Worldcom, you would have less than $5.00 left.

If you had bought $1,000.00 worth of Budweiser (the beer, not the stock) one year ago, drank all the beer, then turned in the cans for the 10 cent deposit, you would have $214.00.

Based on the above, my current investment advice is to drink heavily and recycle.

81 posted on 07/16/2002 10:12:45 AM PDT by Neets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: FITZ
I agree. I don't think there's much to be gained from an average person watching the market on an hourly, or even daily, basis and trying to make sense of it. Perhaps some people are just a wee bit obsessive....
82 posted on 07/16/2002 10:13:40 AM PDT by technochick99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Southack
Japan is not publicly complaining, but they are intervening in the currency market to keep the yen from rising above 115 yen to the dollar. The last thing they want is for their exports to us to be too expensive.

I don't think they can win the battle of the printing press, although they may try.

The only danger is that we may print more dollars than the goods we produce, which is inflationary, of course.

83 posted on 07/16/2002 10:16:12 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: OneidaM
Shrewd advice!! Go long booze, short sleep ;-)
84 posted on 07/16/2002 10:16:37 AM PDT by habs4ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: habs4ever; OneidaM
And buy Budweiser. I own a few shares of Bud.
85 posted on 07/16/2002 10:19:34 AM PDT by .38sw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone; RJayneJ
I agree, except that Japan should be running up inflation by turning their printing presses on High in order to make their exports cheaper and encourage people in Japan to invest rather than hoard their money as they are currently doing.

They still haven't figured out that it is the velocity of money that makes or breaks their prosperity.

Just as in South America where the super-rich hoard their money rather than cycle it, the low money-turnover-speed in Japan (among average Japanese citizens) is the cause of their continued economic doldrums.

But start running up just a little bit of inflation (not so much that people switch the currency on their savings), and then people either have to spend their money to "get something for it" or else they will lose the value of their money by sitting on it.

86 posted on 07/16/2002 10:23:01 AM PDT by Southack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
I never claimed to be creative, just tedious and screechingly annoying.
87 posted on 07/16/2002 12:03:15 PM PDT by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Bears still chomping bump

I still have half my money in my 401k. I don't want to look.

88 posted on 07/16/2002 2:40:59 PM PDT by #3Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Wyatt's Torch
This is on purpose. They are trying to devalue the dollar and reflate the price level in order to offset the deflationary devestation they themselves created with the "strong-dollar"/tight money policy. We need inflation just to get prices back where they should be.

I kind of have my doubts about that. First, while Greenspan is politically brilliant, he is economically clueless, and his role in the strong dollar was an unintended consequence of his war against economic growth and full employment. If it weren't for 911, Greenspan would still have a tight monetary policy to combat the mythical "wealth effect." Second, the weak dollar isn't just liquidity driven. It's also driven by investors seeing diminishing prospects for any sort of significant economic growth in the US. Third, consummate demand manager Bush wants a weak dollar so that farm exports can lead us to his idea of prosperity, I kid you not.

89 posted on 07/16/2002 2:52:37 PM PDT by Moonman62
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
Not going to argue the last two because you are correct. For the first, for the last five years I felt the same way. But I think Greenspan has learned his lesson and informally re-adopted his old gold-price rule. I may be reaching but with the influx of cash over the last 9 months (huge spike and then withdrawal after 9-11) can't be coincidental. Perhaps I'm giving him too much credit and the Fed is only defending their 1.75% FF rate.
90 posted on 07/16/2002 5:03:32 PM PDT by Wyatt's Torch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Southack
You did notice my caveat about more Enrons showing up in the news. I strongly believe that to be the case, so we're well above bottom (Dow 4000, NASDAQ 600 and S&P 350 by mid-October, anyone?). I'm not going to say how many more Enrons it's going to take, only that I think there's that many out there.

FWIW, outside of my 401(k), which has a long way to go before I near retirement and is as diversified as it can be, I'm nowhere near this market, and if I had some spare money, it'd be waiting in a passbook account waiting for the November elections (it would get a pittance of a return, and I would still be able to pull it out in the event of market bottom being hit).

91 posted on 07/17/2002 4:58:11 AM PDT by steveegg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Is today "digestion day" for the bears? The major indexes' futures (as reported by CNN, the only place I have been able to find the futures numbers) have the Dow up 87, NASDAQ up 17 and S&P up 9.

Uurp! <VBG>

92 posted on 07/17/2002 5:11:54 AM PDT by steveegg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steveegg
This is fun. Because I am not exposed in the market, besides a 401k that is not to be touched for 25 years or more, predicting the daily trends for me is kinda my version of Football or Horse Racing.

I think today might be a regroup day. Sharply higher open, then settling back down to middling levels.

Of course, these daily predictions are a hell of a lot less accurate than longer term ones.

93 posted on 07/17/2002 5:16:21 AM PDT by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
As long as I remember not to open my quarterly 401k mail, I'm all right. I usually stick with football (how are the Bears looking, BTW? :) , but since training camp isn't open yet,....

The bears will be back hungry tomorrow. It must be the Midwest air that causes us to think alike.

Who has the thread duties today? I don't have any good links, so I'm out.

94 posted on 07/17/2002 6:16:56 AM PDT by steveegg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: steveegg
I usually stick with football (how are the Bears looking, BTW? :)

I don't do football.

I do stocks or computer games or training my animals, ANYTHING but football.

What a waste of a pig!

95 posted on 07/17/2002 6:22:13 AM PDT by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Oh well, nobody's perfect :)

CNBC on and waiting for the opening bell. I've got Dow up 35, NASDAQ up 7 and S&P up 2 inside of 5 minutes.

96 posted on 07/17/2002 6:26:34 AM PDT by steveegg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

I was a bit pessimistic (that's the bear in me). Dow opened up 66, Nasdaq up 39 and S&P up 8 (hey, at least I was close on S&P). Enjoy the bubble.
97 posted on 07/17/2002 6:32:42 AM PDT by steveegg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Hey, was I the only person on the planet who knew the dot-com crash would come? What goes up always comes down. I was actually very surprised it lasted as long as it did.
98 posted on 07/17/2002 6:41:21 AM PDT by Little Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Little Bush
Anyone who remembered the old rules of stocks knew that the bubble would burst. What you and I forgot to factor in was the political factor (S(l)ick Willie needing a large, long-lasting bubble to survive).

Dow +224
NASDAQ +49
S&P +21
Curbs are in (can't have a wild one-day swing back up, can we?).

99 posted on 07/17/2002 6:44:38 AM PDT by steveegg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: cibco
You're off by a day, but if you're a day-trader, you had best have bought yesterday afternoon.
100 posted on 07/17/2002 6:46:08 AM PDT by steveegg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-127 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson