Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lipscomb expects to get back in the game
The Dallas Morning News ^ | July 14, 2002 | By JEFFREY WEISS / The Dallas Morning News

Posted on 07/14/2002 6:05:52 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
Lipscomb expects to get back in the game

So is that another way for the DMN to say he's going to
get back to his stirring up trouble in the black community
in Dallas again? Sheesh!

Al Lipscomb and John Wiley Price. I've seen dirty tag team
wrestling matches with a lot more class.

1 posted on 07/14/2002 6:05:52 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Squantos; SpookBrat; CaTexan; anymouse; Allegra; archy; bexardave; Billie; boofer_billy; ...
Ping a few Texans.


Please let me know if you want ON or OFF my Texas ping list!. . .don't be shy.
No, you don't HAVE to be a Texan to get on this list!

2 posted on 07/14/2002 6:07:15 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
Isn't the whole reason was only given "house arrest" after his conviction because his health was so very, very poor?

I guess he has made a miraculous recovery.

Let's hope they try him again, but if the trial is in Dallas, his odds of conviction are non-existent.

3 posted on 07/14/2002 6:20:49 AM PDT by 07055
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
Brenda Fields, a Dallas NAACP board member, said he can always tell his personal story as inspiration for present and future generations

...and keep the "dream" alive.

4 posted on 07/14/2002 6:22:38 AM PDT by TADSLOS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
I saw some of this on WFAA-TV and I'm here to tell you that something fishy is going on. Lipscomb said in a TV interview that he received a call from a Judge one night telling him that the 60 some odd charges of fraud and corruption had been overturned and that he was a free man.

I could understand if SOME of the charges had been dropped or overturned - but not all of them.

Was this Judge an appeals court judge or what? If so, I didn't know his case was on appeals. I wonder if Ron Kirk figures into this at all?

Lipscomb isn't out of the woods yet. WFAA reported that he could still be retried on all of the 68 or 69 charges. Somehow I doubt if that will happen.

5 posted on 07/14/2002 6:38:32 AM PDT by Brownie74
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
Seems like every city has a "tag team" of the kind you mean.

I remember that when I was growing up in Birmingham, Alabama, we had a couple of ministers whose names I can't recall, who were part of the SCLC, the Southern Christian Leadership Conference--Dr. King's umbrella organization--who did NOTHING but foment hate and division every time they got in front of a microphone.

"Ministers of the gospel," indeed. The satanic gospel of racial strife.

6 posted on 07/14/2002 6:39:41 AM PDT by Illbay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
In all honesty, though, I must say that John Wiley Price has been pretty low
profile the last couple of years or so......
7 posted on 07/14/2002 6:41:43 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brownie74

I saw some of this on WFAA-TV and I'm here to tell you that something fishy is going on. Lipscomb said in a TV interview that he received a call from a Judge one night telling him that the 60 some odd charges of fraud and corruption had been overturned and that he was a free man.

I could understand if SOME of the charges had been dropped or overturned - but not all of them.

Was this Judge an appeals court judge or what? If so, I didn't know his case was on appeals. I wonder if Ron Kirk figures into this at all?

Lipscomb isn't out of the woods yet. WFAA reported that he could still be retried on all of the 68 or 69 charges. Somehow I doubt if that will happen.

I know. It does all seem so weird that all of a sudden he's been sprung. I have
no idea what might be brewing here.

From the article:

But adults were more familiar with Mr. Lipscomb. And the older they were, the more they seemed to be tuned in to his legacy.

Helen Sorrells, a retired social worker, was volunteering at a fund-raiser for Mount Olive Lutheran Church, next door to James Madison High School. She recalled a meeting 25 years ago at her children's junior high.

"He's worked this area years and years and years," she said. "I think that among some of the older generation, they cannot help but look back and see he's been such an influence on public policy in a positive sense."

Huh? This doesn't sound like the same Al Lipscomb I know. I think that the
DMN's LIBERAL bias must be showing here?

8 posted on 07/14/2002 6:57:23 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
Five will get you ten that this is going to get swept under the rug. I hope not. I hope the DA reopens the case and we find out who or what is at the bottom of this. As I said earlier - don't count Ron Kirk out. You can also throw John Wiley Price into the equation.

Kirk, Lipscomb, and Price. Would you play poker with these characters?

9 posted on 07/14/2002 7:29:25 AM PDT by Brownie74
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Brownie74
Yeah, I'm sure that Kirk has the 5th Circuit in his back pocket...

You seem to be singularly uninformed - of course the verdict was appealed, and the conviction was overturned due to the change of venue (thus all convictions on all counts were reversed).

Brownie74 sayeth:

Lipscomb said in a TV interview that he received a call from a Judge one night telling him that the 60 some odd charges of fraud and corruption had been overturned and that he was a free man.

I could understand if SOME of the charges had been dropped or overturned - but not all of them.

Was this Judge an appeals court judge or what? If so, I didn't know his case was on appeals. I wonder if Ron Kirk figures into this at all?

10 posted on 07/14/2002 7:48:00 AM PDT by Tickle Me Pank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Brownie74
I could understand if SOME of the charges had been dropped or overturned - but not all of them.

Well here's what the article says is going on here:

His conviction was overturned because the federal appeals court ruled that his trial had been improperly moved from Dallas to Amarillo. But the judges did not comment on the strength or weakness of the government's case. Prosecutors have yet to decide whether to appeal, conduct a new trial or drop the charges.

Mr. Lipscomb admits that he failed to properly report thousands of dollars of donations while he was a Dallas City Council member, but he denies that the donations were bribes.

The ambiguous nature of his vindication leaves some people with mixed feelings.

< snip >

U.S. District Judge Joe Kendall moved the trial to Amarillo, citing "significant media attention" and Mr. Lipscomb's status as "one of the most influential and well-known" leaders in Dallas' black community for three decades as key factors in his decision.

During the trial, witnesses said Mr. Lipscomb accepted envelopes stuffed with cash.

"It smells. We can't deny that," Scottie Allen, a member of Mr. Lipscomb's defense team, said during the trial. "But we always conceded the fact that he got some cash."

Mr. Lipscomb has consistently maintained that he got money from friends who wanted to subsidize his work and augment the $50-per-meeting pay that council members received.

He said that his work as an activist required him to accept confidential contributions to help support his family but that the "donations" bought no favors from him.

The jury didn't buy that argument and convicted Mr. Lipscomb on all 65 counts. He resigned from the council in February 2000. He was sentenced that April to spend 41 months at home wearing an electronic monitor bracelet.

Hmm?? Why is it I feel that they will decide that he has already served 27
months and decide to just leave it alone because he's served his time? Well,
I guess that's fine. I'd like for them to strike a deal that that is what they'll do
IF he'll agree to keep a low profile and not run for office any more!
11 posted on 07/14/2002 8:01:39 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tickle Me Pank
You seem to be singularly uninformed....

Yes I am. That is why I am asking questions. I have bigger fish to fry than Al Lipscomb.

12 posted on 07/14/2002 8:23:38 AM PDT by Brownie74
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Brownie74
Kirk, Lipscomb, and Price. Would you play poker with these characters?

LOL! No, thanks. I'd rather take a tour of the Rattlesnake farm. I'd feel safer.

13 posted on 07/14/2002 8:23:43 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
His conviction was overturned because the federal appeals court ruled that his trial had been improperly moved from Dallas to Amarillo.

OK - I remember that now. I think they cited racial bias if he were tried in Dallas or something like that.

14 posted on 07/14/2002 8:29:39 AM PDT by Brownie74
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Brownie74
If they had moved OJ's trial to Santa Monica, he would have been convicted too.
15 posted on 07/14/2002 8:51:05 AM PDT by 07055
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: 07055
If they had moved OJ's trial to Santa Monica, he would have been convicted too.

Interesting point. I watched every minute of the OJ trial from the freeway chase to the final verdict. I don't know that a change of venue would have mattered much. The "Dream Team" had the prosecution on the ropes throughout the trial.

I am not saying OJ is innocent but I don't see how anything but a not guilty verdict could have come down. Perhaps a Judge other than Lance Ito would have made a difference in the trial. That was one heck of a circus!!

16 posted on 07/14/2002 9:09:20 AM PDT by Brownie74
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Tickle Me Pank
I wonder if Ron Kirk figures into this at all?

Figures? And just what would you know about figures? Can you add them, subtract them, uglify them, or deride them? Seen any Sonny days lately?

17 posted on 07/14/2002 9:23:48 AM PDT by DallasMike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Tickle Me Pank
All incomprehensible inside jokes asides, I agree that Kirk's political connections probably had something to do with this. Kirk is a nice guy personally, but a snake. Lipscomb's case was on appeal, and it was a 5th Circuit Appeals Court judge that remanded it back to the lower court for retrial.

My guess is that the political heat will be turned up not to retry poor Al because he's suffered enough already. He was forced to take those "confidential contributions" to support his family and just "forgot" to report them to the IRS.

18 posted on 07/14/2002 9:32:06 AM PDT by DallasMike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: DallasMike
The chances of Al being retried are between slim and none. It was a brave RAT US Attorney who tried him in the first place---I doubt a Republican would be willing to take the heat.

If Kirk is elected, its more likely the government will pay Lipscomb millions of dollars to compensate for his "loss of freedom" while under house arrest.

19 posted on 07/14/2002 9:45:44 AM PDT by 07055
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: DallasMike
By the way, what happened to Joe Kendall?
20 posted on 07/14/2002 9:48:20 AM PDT by 07055
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson