Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CLINTON'S WALL ST.
New York Post ^ | Sunday, July 14, 2002 | By JAMES HIGGINS

Posted on 07/14/2002 4:15:31 AM PDT by JohnHuang2

Edited on 05/26/2004 5:07:28 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: MamaLucci
Bump!!! How's our sweet MamaLucci? Doing well, I hope!
21 posted on 07/14/2002 12:15:07 PM PDT by AuntB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: AuntB
I'm doing well, AuntB, thanks so much for asking!
PS: You're purty darned sweet yourself!
22 posted on 07/14/2002 12:42:27 PM PDT by MamaLucci
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Why is anyone surprised? We watched, for 8 long years, people getting away with things that would have normally caused horrendous shame and disaster. There WAS not accountability. When people high up in government stand up in front of our justice system and boldly lie and get away with it why would we be surprised when others emulated them?

Capitalism and freedom are not for a corrupt people. Only those who regulate themselves based on a strong inner core can handle freedom. As our president said, capitalism requires CHARACTER.

That lesson was forgotten during the past decade. It's time we straighten up, this is just as much the fault of the media and the American people. The people stood silent while the media excused wrongdoing. The media crooned "Everyone does it" and the people shrugged. Now we have a decent man in office and the media is pointing their filthy fingers at good men. If the people stand silent again we no longer deserve freedom or prosperity.

23 posted on 07/14/2002 1:17:16 PM PDT by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *Clinton Haters
indexing
24 posted on 07/14/2002 4:12:52 PM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MamaLucci
How do we know Clinton had no interest in them?

I'd like to see someone ask Levitt for all his correspondence on the independent auditor rule that he received from both houses of Congress and from Bubba.

No way was this scuttled due to disinterest.

Nice spin by the author, though.

25 posted on 07/14/2002 4:16:02 PM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
And if anyone is wondering why the Post might want to spin this, that list of Levitt's correspondents would include some Pubbies, too.
26 posted on 07/14/2002 4:21:39 PM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
Are you implying that they scuttled in the hopes that it might come to light (hit the fan) during the next ( ie. current ) administration.
27 posted on 07/14/2002 6:03:26 PM PDT by KayEyeDoubleDee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: dano1
bump
28 posted on 07/15/2002 6:02:46 PM PDT by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: muggs
bump
29 posted on 07/17/2002 7:50:32 AM PDT by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: timestax
(excerpting)
Rubin, Treasury secretary from 1995 to 1999, is now a director of the Citigroup financial conglomerate. He is the ne plus ultra of eminent Clintonians. After Alan Greenspan, he is the most respected figure in international financial markets.

Did Rubin, whose firm is a major lender to Enron, ask Fisher for the same thing that Enron's Kenneth Lay asked Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill for, a bailout, some form of government financing? No - the request was both more subtle and potentially more damaging to the good health of America's markets.

WHAT Rubin asked for, by all accounts, was for Fisher to call the debt rating agencies and ask them to find an "alternative" to a downgrade of Enron's securities. This was an astounding request. The rating agencies are meant to be neutral arbiters of the financial strength of the entities they rate. Rubin's request was akin to the owner of a team faced with playoff elimination asking the league commissioner to get the referees to call the next game so that the owner's team doesn't lose.

The Clinton administration had a simple way to resolve this tension: law enforcement had to yield to fund-raising. It must have been difficult enough to persuade a CEO to come to the White House for coffee at $50,000 a cup. With pending securities-law investigations in the background, it would have been impossible. So the dogs had to be called off.

CLINTON's chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) was Arthur Levitt Jr., former head of the American Stock Exchange and son of a legendarily upstanding New York state comptroller. To his immense credit, Levitt saw the outlines of many of the disasters that have since emerged and sought to address them before they got out of hand.

But with his proposals lacking the promise of fund-raising, improved poll numbers, or the Nobel Peace Prize, Clinton had no interest in them.

THE system is in far worse shape when a central and respected figure like Robert Rubin feels free to try and rig the game than when an Ivan Boesky - who even before his arrest was thought by most in the financial market to be a shady character - is trading on inside information.


Where in the world is Robert Rubin?

30 posted on 07/22/2002 12:23:53 PM PDT by MamaLucci
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson