What are you smoking or injecting? Is patriotism and love of the Constitution alien concepts?
We have missles, an airforce, and a navy the preclude the necessity of ever sending our troops abroad. Punishment, not conquest, should be the reponse to any threat abroad.
When Baghdad, Riyahd, and Damacus are memories, their examples will insure our security.
Any other internationalist involvement insures the loss of our troops and the financial gain of the Internationalists.
Our troops should be put on our borders, whose defence is their Constitutional perogative.
The article seems to want to describe this, and at points does, but gets lost in the identity and faction-naming game.