[rightofrush]

The paleo right is less distinguishable from the America-hating left every day.

What are you smoking or injecting? Is patriotism and love of the Constitution alien concepts?

We have missles, an airforce, and a navy the preclude the necessity of ever sending our troops abroad. Punishment, not conquest, should be the reponse to any threat abroad.

When Baghdad, Riyahd, and Damacus are memories, their examples will insure our security.

Any other internationalist involvement insures the loss of our troops and the financial gain of the Internationalists.
Our troops should be put on our borders, whose defence is their Constitutional perogative.

[Truthsayer20]

"Is patriotism and love of the Constitution alien concepts?"

Patriotism? I'm sorry but it's pretty evident that some folks on the right have given up on America. They, like the left-wing America-haters, aren't interested in conventional political change. All they are interested in is undermining our institutions, our president and "understanding" our enemies.

[DugwayDuke]

"Punishment, not conquest, should be the reponse to any threat abroad." and "Our troops should be put on our borders, whose defence is their Constitutional perogative."

These two statements demonstrate the fallacy of the paleo argument. Somehow, we are too believe that it is better to respond to threats by punishment after the fact than preemption before the fact. And, that it is better to fight a war on our own territory than to fight one on the territory of our foes.