Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge Allows Danielle's Dad Back In Court: (Damon was banned for MAD-DOGGING Westerfield!)
North County Times-San Diego ^ | July 13, 2002 | Kimberly Epler

Posted on 07/13/2002 6:28:25 AM PDT by FresnoDA

Judge allows Danielle's dad back in court

KIMBERLY EPLER
Staff Writer

SAN DIEGO ---- The father of 7-year-old murder victim Danielle van Dam will be allowed to attend the remaining days of her accused murderer's trial, Judge William Mudd ruled Thursday.

But he warned Damon van Dam that one more incident will result in him being banned from the courthouse.


Two weeks ago, Judge Mudd deemed Damon van Dam a "security risk" for repeatedly staring down his daughter's accused murderer, David Westerfield, in courtroom hallways despite several warnings from sheriff's deputies and prosecutors.

Mudd then barred Damon van Dam from the third floor of the downtown San Diego courthouse where Westerfield's emotionally charged trial on charges he kidnapped and murdered Danielle is being held.

On Thursday, an attorney for the van Dam family requested that Damon van Dam be allowed back in the courtroom so he could provide emotional support to his wife, Brenda van Dam, and dispel any jury speculation that his absence meant he didn't care about the trial or that he had something to hide.

The van Dams were present at the hearing, but did not address the court.

Mudd said he believed Damon van Dam has had time to think about his actions and told him that security officials were willing to give him another chance.

"If I get one report of one incident, I will ban you from the courthouse," Mudd told van Dam.

Mudd also cautioned the couple that closing arguments in the case may push them to the limits of what they can handle. The prosecution has indicted it intends to use photos of Danielle's decomposing body while presenting its argument that Westerfield molested the second-grader before she was suffocated and her nude body dumped along a rural road.

Danielle disappeared from her second-story bedroom sometime after her father tucked her into bed on Feb. 1. The next morning she was gone. Westerfield was arrested for the crime five days before her body was discovered by search volunteers on Feb. 27.

The medical examiner has testified that her body was too badly decomposed to determine time of death or whether she was sexually assaulted.

The defense is likely to attack the van Dams' integrity and argue their lifestyle choices ---- including the van Dams' admitted drug use and previous sexual relations with other couples ---- put their children at risk. The van Dams also have two sons.

Prosecutors and the defense attorney have made it their practice to notify the judge before showing jurors graphic photographs of Danielle's body during the six-week trial so the van Dams could be asked to leave the courtroom.

Mudd said he expects the van Dams to leave if any part of the trial becomes too much for them.

"I don't think anybody is downplaying the emotion that both Mr. and Mrs. van Dam are going through," Mudd said.

Westerfield's attorney, Steven Feldman, said Westerfield did not object to Damon van Dam returning to the courtroom, but there still were security concerns. Feldman said Damon van Dam was "mad-dogging" the defense team, or shooting dirty looks at the attorneys.

Feldman said the van Dams have been "verbally attacking" potential buyers who are looking at Westerfield's Sabre Springs home, which is two doors down from their house. Westerfield signed the house over to his attorneys.

Feldman also accused Brenda van Dam of muttering a curse word at one of Westerfield's friends who testified earlier this week.

Prosecutor Jeff Dusek told Mudd that Brenda van Dam denies making any such comment and a victim witness advocate who accompanies her each day backs up her account.

Testimony in the Westerfield trial is on hold until July 22 when Mudd returns from a vacation. At Thursday's hearing, Feldman said he expects the defense will take two or three days more before resting its case. Prosecutors may then present rebuttal witnesses before closing arguments begin sometime in late July or early August.

 

Contact staff writer Kimberly Epler at (760) 739-6644 or kepler@nctimes.com.

7/12/02


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: 180frank; vandam; westerfield
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 521-540541-560561-580 ... 701-707 next last
To: All
Isn't Rick Roberts the one who started the rumor that BVD bought a million dollar home, without DVD? Maybe he's heard from their lawyer. When exactly did he change his tune?
541 posted on 07/14/2002 7:03:17 PM PDT by the-gooroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 532 | View Replies]

To: bvw
"The Choir Boys" is the single funniest book I have ever read. I'll never forget laughing so hard. "Pull the Train" "The Three kinds of ......" "The glass coffee table...."
542 posted on 07/14/2002 7:03:34 PM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 537 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
I'm still waiting for the defense to show that dw didn't kill her..

I'm waiting for the prosecution to show that he did ...

543 posted on 07/14/2002 7:03:48 PM PDT by dread78645
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 517 | View Replies]

To: bvw
Think of the Joe Wambaugh stories.

You read Wambaugh? Good for you. If there's one person I would like to see write a book about all this, it would be Wambaugh.
544 posted on 07/14/2002 7:05:02 PM PDT by NatureGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 532 | View Replies]

To: dread78645
"I'm waiting for the prosecution to show that he did ..."


Me, too. And the defense DOES NOT have to PROVE ANYTHING! Except third party culpability & they've done a very good job of that.


545 posted on 07/14/2002 7:05:59 PM PDT by the Deejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 543 | View Replies]

To: the Deejay
I thought DW might have done it, until the prosecution cleared him.
546 posted on 07/14/2002 7:08:07 PM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 545 | View Replies]

To: spectre
How could she leave the viewers with the wrong impression?...Duh.

If it wasn't on the Tele-Prompter --facts don't exist.

547 posted on 07/14/2002 7:08:43 PM PDT by dread78645
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 534 | View Replies]

To: John Jamieson
"I thought DW might have done it, until the prosecution cleared him."


I thought so, too, untill the 4th day in the prelim. I told my husband, "I don't think they have the right guy. I think he's innocent, unless the prosecution comes up with more hard evidence by trial time." Well, they didn't and I'm still NOT CONVINCED. In fact, DW looks more innocent than ever.


548 posted on 07/14/2002 7:13:04 PM PDT by the Deejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 546 | View Replies]

To: 185JHP
"Leftists believe they're more right when they're wrong, than we're right when we're right"

That is so perfect!

549 posted on 07/14/2002 7:15:48 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 491 | View Replies]

To: the Deejay
it sure sounds like Whorealdo & guests know the prosecution is LOSING the case & Whorealdo put this out for "public opinion."

You know, I've just about caught up with the past 3 days of threads here. And I'm plenty impressed with some of the stuff being posted!

For instance, the press articles on the sealed affidavits. You know, the ones where Westerfield says, "The desert is a good place to leave a body", and "Be patient. You will find what you're looking for." Isn't it just amazing that these little leaks about what's been said in the affidavits happen to come out NOW, and come out when the affidavits have been sealed? I wonder if the info. in these documents is as accurate as that from the application for the Search Warrant (posted earlier)??

And now Whorealdo ("Mick Jagger and Baryshnikov made a Manwich out of me!") has on guests talkin' up the prosection line...Wow!

You'd almost think that the Bug Guy dropped a little damage on the prosecution on Thursday.
550 posted on 07/14/2002 7:17:46 PM PDT by NatureGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 540 | View Replies]

To: NatureGirl
The desert is a good place to leave a body", and "Be patient. You will find what you're looking for."


To me, that just sounds like someone who is trying to help, but certainly doesn't have a clue as to where the child is or if she's alright. They are "twisting" his words to suit their (poor excuse) case.

In fact, he also stated that his daughter had been gone a morning or two when she was a child and they found her playing with a neighbor.
551 posted on 07/14/2002 7:22:36 PM PDT by the Deejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 550 | View Replies]

To: NatureGirl
He sure did! I'm sure there's more to come!
552 posted on 07/14/2002 7:22:42 PM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 550 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
we NEVER spoke about politics to avoid loud disagreements

I was raised to avoid talking about politics and religion if I didn't want to ruin a friendship. These days we kind of talk more about politics and during impeachment there was no doubt where I stood. I made sure I told the family I was writing and calling my congressman to DO THE RIGHT THING. Well, I always avoided that kind of talk with friends until about three years ago I befriended one of my daughter's mothers. We hit it off so well. Then came the day she mentioned clinton in a favorable way. I was STUNNED. She would continue to broach the subject until I told her where I stood. So we started talking politics. Now our friendship is much more casual. We did not talk hardly at all during the election of 2000 and it made me sick to think she was rooting for gore. I am so glad for FR where ideas can be fleshed out.

553 posted on 07/14/2002 7:22:43 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 492 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
When I was a child, the very few discussions I recall of my parents, grandparents, other relatives talking politics There were never heated or loud discussions. But this was back in the late 40' & 50's, when people were more civil and understanding of one another.
554 posted on 07/14/2002 7:27:29 PM PDT by the Deejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 553 | View Replies]

To: NatureGirl
One of the best things I learned in high school was that some people who don't like you, and won't ever like you, nevertheless are offended that you won't expend any efforts to get them to like you. BTW have you seen the book "Odd Girl Out - The Hidden Culture Of Aggression In Girls" - guess what it made me think of?
555 posted on 07/14/2002 7:27:59 PM PDT by 185JHP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 539 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper; Valpal1; Amore; FresnoDA; All
Wonders never cease...the amazing turn around of our fellow freepers towards Rick Roberts is sure a shocker. I've been saying the same thing about him and the leak from day one. (I just knew they'd catch up with me at some point!!) heh heh heh Hey, I am sure val said something similar about him..what about you cyn??
556 posted on 07/14/2002 7:31:02 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 553 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
Thanks.
557 posted on 07/14/2002 7:31:41 PM PDT by 185JHP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 549 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Missing Children Reports Made

What is the age they use to define a child in these reports ?
558 posted on 07/14/2002 7:32:27 PM PDT by pyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 471 | View Replies]

To: NatureGirl
And you know that Geraldo had fat from his buttocks transplanted into his face during a televised plastic surgery session--my laugh about all that is that it made him a real-life butt-head.
559 posted on 07/14/2002 7:32:37 PM PDT by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 550 | View Replies]

To: dread78645; bvw
That was poor wording..I'm waiting for him to bring forth DOUBT...
560 posted on 07/14/2002 7:34:34 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 543 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 521-540541-560561-580 ... 701-707 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson