Posted on 07/12/2002 3:11:27 PM PDT by Lady In Blue
The June volume does not reflect the $845,000 sale by Bush, which would be about 211,000 shares. June volume is listed on your chart as 12,700. Was the sale made off the record? There have been public statements to the effect that the stock purchase from Bush was made by a wealthy Bahraini, again implying that the whole thing was a set-up.
Anyone who has followed the financial escapades of the Bush family would not be surprised by the above.
I'm going to withhold judgement until I see a chart showing the stock before the Bahraini announcement and up thru Bush's sale.
That it was basically a scam is shown by two factors: a) Harken had no off shore drilling experience, and b) Harken never drilled a single well off shore in Barhain on the basis of that contract.
So, if a company has no offshore drilling experience, they never get any? Someone had to drill the first offshore well. Couldn't they hire engineers and oil men with the necessary experience?
Date | Open | High | Low | Close | Volume | Adj. Close* |
Source: Yahoo Finance: HEC |
Date | Open | High | Low | Close | Volume | Adj. Close* |
I don't see a big boost in January and even if there were, why would Bush wait until June to sell if "The Fix was in"?
This is one story of how the sale occurred.....
The broker who handled the controversial sale of President Bush's energy stock in 1990 said yesterday that he suggested the deal to Bush, but the future President hesitated because he wanted to make sure the sale was allowed."There isn't a person of any more integrity that I've talked to in my life. He was a straight shooter," retired broker Ralph Smith told the Daily News in a telephone interview from his Los Angeles home.
He blamed renewed questioning of Bush's Harken Energy stock trade on "Clintonites" and called Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle and House Minority Leader Dick Gephardt both Democrats "a couple of rats."
Smith said the trade came about because he called Bush on behalf of an "institution" that wanted to buy Harken Energy stock after other Harken directors said they did not want to sell. Bush also was a member of company's board.
At first, Smith said Bush told him "he didn't know if he could sell, and to check back."
"I checked with the [Harken] lawyers to make sure he could sell. ... They said that he could," he said. The former broker said it was "implicit" in later conversations that Bush also had sought legal advice.
Smith said he called again a couple of weeks later, and "then he said he would be interested in selling. [Bush] decided on the amount," and in June 1990 sold 212,140 shares for $835,807.
Before the deal went through, Smith said, Harken's lawyers wrote "a letter to the transfer agent ... [assuring him] there was no insider information available that wasn't available to the public. That's why he was allowed to sell."
Democrats have suggested Bush who has decried greed and fraud that has hurt investors may have been involved in insider trading because shortly after the sale, Harken stock fell. Bush also failed to file necessary paperwork with the Securities and Exchange Commission for eight months.
Smith said he was interviewed about the deal by two lawyers from the SEC the only time in his 25-year career that a trade he made resulted in such a probe.
Denies Political Link
He also rejected the whispers that some fat cat wanted to buy stock from Bush, whose father was then President, to curry favor with the White House.
"There wasn't anything political involved in any way, shape or form. ... Buyer didn't know who the seller is. Seller didn't know who the buyer is," Smith said. "I didn't divulge."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.