Replies

Your words are like the pot calling the kettle black, bud.

Are you who you say you are? Are you really a veteran aviator? Do you really have blood in your veins or is that ice water? I never said anything about having coffee with you, toots. But I'll bet there are things we *would* agree on.

As far as *once again* calling me an anti father feminazi, you're wrong. Perhaps you can ask my husband about that. Go ahead and ask. His screen name is Fidgit. He knows me better than *anyone*.

Interesting that you accept Newdow for what he *says* he is. How do you *know* his claims are truth? Do you know him personally? Do you truly see how he lives his life? Do you know for certain he even pays child support? Proof? He's a liar about some things. A fool about many. Looks like you appreciate the company of him...a fool. Maybe you *are* Newdow. LOL

Your peas are getting cold.

Your words are like the pot calling the kettle black, bud.

Chuckle! You're losing it here, Mama. Better take some debating lessons from Ann Coulter. She'd set you straight about that foaming-at-the-mouth routine you've got going on.

Are you who you say you are? Are you really a veteran aviator?

I don't believe I have ever claimed to be an aviator, veteran or otherwise. Perhaps I'm a veterinarian who works exclusively on birds. Maybe I'm a military veteran who owns a private plane. Maybe I'm a frequent business traveler who travels a lot by air. And maybe none of those are true. You know, Mama, we'd both be better served if you didn't jump to so many conclusions. Just because you claim to be a "homeschool mama" doesn't mean a thing about anyone else. Maybe my handle means something. Maybe it doesn't. But you just don't know, do you? And anything you have to say about it is a guess.

Do you really have blood in your veins or is that ice water?

My physician says it's blood. You can take that or leave it, since I don't care to provide you with any proof. See how this works?

I never said anything about having coffee with you, toots.

I know you didn't. I did. You're not the only one moving the discussion here, toots. If I want to bring up coffee, I certainly don't need your permission to do it.

But I'll bet there are things we *would* agree on."

Possibly.

As far as *once again* calling me an anti father feminazi, you're wrong.

I didn't call you an "anti father feminazi." I said "Heck, for all we know, you could be some Dumocrat troll with an anti-fatherhood agenda, and if you're not, you're missing a great chance, because you're doing a good job parroting their feminazi line." I didn't call you an "anti father feminazi." I said you were doing a good job "parroting their feminazi line." Please try harder to read the posts to which you respond. Details do make the difference.

Perhaps you can ask my husband about that. Go ahead and ask. His screen name is Fidgit. He knows me better than *anyone*.

And how, exactly, do you you plan to demonstrate to me that this "Fidgit" person really is your husband? For all I know, it could be another screen name that you use. I'm still not convinced that you aren't -- as I said -- a Dumocrat troll, and a Dumocrat troll certainly wouldn't stop at one screen name.

Interesting that you accept Newdow for what he *says* he is. How do you *know* his claims are truth?

Actually, this part should be obvious to you if you are who you claim to be. Despite weeks of being under a media microscope, very few of Newdow's claims have been refuted. While I wouldn't expect CNN or the WashPost to blow the lid off of any irregularities in Newdow's claims, we do have Fox News, the Washington Times, NewsMax, World Net Daily and CNS. And any of them would be more than happy to trot out proof that Newdow was lying. So where's the beef, Mama? If Newdow's been stalking his family, where's the proof? If he hasn't been paying child support, where are the court documents to support the complaint?

The fact of the matter is that this man brought a court case that you don't like. And you're so desperate to discredit him that you'll claim to be on a first-name basis with his wife -- but curiously, you won't bring out any proof to support anything you say. Sounds to me like you're making claims that you WISH were true.

Do you know him personally? Do you truly see how he lives his life? Do you know for certain he even pays child support? Proof?

Once again, the media microscope has not dug up any proof to the contrary. And don't you think there are conservative news operations who have been trying to do just exactly that? Sometimes, silence speaks louder than words. The fact that these respected news operations haven't been able to support any of those claims is quite telling.

He's a liar about some things.

If he is lying about his parenting -- and that hasn't been proven -- it isn't because YOU say so.

A fool about many.

Ah. Here's the issue. You don't like the guy, so you manke wild, unsupported claims about him. When you're called upon to back up what you say, you sink to indignant name-calling. Mama, do you think you could leave the Dumocrat debating tactics out of this, and instead argue like a real conservative who respects truth and honesty?

Looks like you appreciate the company of him...a fool. Maybe you *are* Newdow. LOL

For all you know, I could be. And as far as we know, you're some anonymous Internet poster who claims to know the mother of his child.