To: knak
She also said her daughter "expressed sadness" after the ruling.
Hmmm, so the "father" was the one who, by his suit, actually harmed the daughter for his own ulterior motives. No wonder the woman wised up and never married him.
44 posted on
07/11/2002 9:34:09 PM PDT by
aruanan
To: aruanan
>>
She also said her daughter "expressed sadness" after the ruling.Wouldn't this make Newdow the one having done the injury to his own daughter? If you cant bring a case to the court unless there is some injured party & the daughter was NOT injured by the Pledge, it seems there is SOME case for injury here & Newdow appears to have DONE it.
Can I get a ban of Atheism here???
Can I get an AMEN!!!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson