Seems that the evolutionists, in their total desperation to give evidence for what there is no evidence committed another one of their paleontological frauds, 'borrowing' bones from one species to use in another to prove their point.
I've heard a lot about eohippus and how it's the best or one of the best examples of evolution. After reading quite a few articles on this topic I can't believe the eohippus is one of the best examples of evolution. The eohippus appears to be just another fraud. Strong words, yet how else can it be described after looking at the available evidence?
What I find so disturbing is that there are some genuine and intelligent folks here that think evolution is a solid interpretation of the evidence; yet when you start looking at the individual cases that support the theory, you have to shake your head in amazement and wonder, why do folks believe in evolution? Some might say you have to connect the dots, yet the dots aren't even dots, they're scattered pieces of unrelated evidence. As usual, I'm sure someone is going to come along and try to change the subject here where objectivity and context are key.
Do the evolutionists have a better example of evolution than the apparent eohippus fraud?
Scripter, you're just candy for any creationist who wants to lie to you about what you want to believe. The "fraud" is far more apparent than real.