It seems like you think that if the defense can't explain everything, then DW must be guilty. I'm a little confused as to the fiber evidence, too, and really wonder how it got into the places that it got to. The prosecution claims that it got there because DW took her into the MH. The search dogs say otherwise. The defense doesn't know how they got there. But the lack of an explanation of the fibers on the part of the defense does not reduce the burden of proof and burden of production for the prosecution.
I think all of us wish the prosecution had their man, but there is a complete absence of evidence to link DW to the kidnapping and murder of Danielle.
Just my opinion, based on what I have seen and heard.
And I have a hard time understanding why others don't see how damning the evidence is! LOL
I could talk until I'm blue in the face, but if one is inclined to think fibers float around and land (another similarity to the OJ trial----Cochran posited that the police covering Nicole's body with a blanket contaminated the scene, even yards away)or that all fibers are found everywhere,then they won't agree with the, obvious to me, fact that her hair, blood and fingerprints, not to mention the fibers linking the two have no business being where they were found.