And I have a hard time understanding why others don't see how damning the evidence is! LOL
I could talk until I'm blue in the face, but if one is inclined to think fibers float around and land (another similarity to the OJ trial----Cochran posited that the police covering Nicole's body with a blanket contaminated the scene, even yards away)or that all fibers are found everywhere,then they won't agree with the, obvious to me, fact that her hair, blood and fingerprints, not to mention the fibers linking the two have no business being where they were found.
But then what do you think of the fact that many fibers found with her body were absent from DW's MH? I think that the hair, drop of blood on carpet in MH and jacket, and fingerprints have already been explained away. At some point, she was in the MH, we know, but it wasn't during the time period in question, we know (search dogs).