Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Expert: Body dumped after defendant fell under suspicion (SO WHO DUMPED DANIELLE VAN DAM'S BODY??)
Union Trib ^ | July 11, 2002 | Steve Perez/Greg Magnus

Posted on 07/11/2002 6:47:45 AM PDT by FresnoDA

Expert: Body dumped after defendant fell under suspicion

by Steve Perez
and
Greg Magnus
SIGNONSANDIEGO

July 10, 2002


Union-Tribune
Susan L. describes her relationship to David Westerfield.
An expert witness called by the defense Wednesday afternoon said he is "very confident" the nude body of Danielle van Dam was probably dumped off Dehesa Road near El Cajon more than a week after murder defendant David Westerfield came under police surveillance.

Insect expert David Faulkner testified he based his conclusion upon studies he conducted on larvae and insects recovered from the victim's body, discovered by volunteer searchers on Feb. 27.

Westerfield is accused of kidnapping 7-year-old Danielle van Dam from the child's bed and killing her five months ago. He could face the death penalty if convicted. This was the final day of defense testimony.

Based on Faulkner's studies, which use the life cycles of insects, the earliest the body could have been left there was Feb. 16 to Feb. 18, he said under questioning from Westerfield's defense attorney.

Earlier Wednesday, San Diego police detective Sgt. Bill Holmes testified that investigators placed a tracking device on Westerfield's car during the first days of the investigation. They tracked his movements until his arrest on Feb. 22.

Defense attorney Steven Feldman has said Westerfield would have had no opportunity to dispose of the body because he was under constant police surveillance from Feb. 4 until his arrest Feb. 22.

A medical examiner relies on three factors to make an assessment, Faulkner has said: the amount and distribution of rigor mortis, the change in body temperature and the degree of decomposition. But after several days, rigor mortis dissipates and the corpse assumes the temperature of its environment.

Insects can give more specific information because they have a definitive development period that can be meticulously measured, said Faulkner, who collected insects during Danielle's autopsy. Faulkner said the presence of specific fly larva and adults and the absence of beetle larva on the body helped him determine an approximate "post-mortem interval."

Faulkner said during normal daylight conditions flies can land upon a body and deposit eggs within 20 minutes of its death. He believed the body had been at its Dehesa location approximately 10-12 days before its discovery.

He admitted under cross-examination by prosecutor Jeff Dusek that weather conditions for February were "extremely abnormal" and could have affected the amount of insects available to find the body.

"There was very warm temperatures in February and no significant rainfall for most of the winter," Faulkner said. "The insect population in general was much lower."

Change of character

A woman who once lived with David Westerfield told prosecutors the defendant's character would change after drinking and he would become "forceful."

"Susan L." mother of "Danielle L.," and Christine Gonzales, both of whom testified earlier, lived with the defendant for nearly a year, beginning about 3 1/2 years ago. The woman's last name was not read into the court record because her daughter, a minor, testified Tuesday.

Before he was charged in February, Westerfield's criminal record consisted of a 1996 drunken-driving conviction.

The woman was called initially as a witness for the defense, during which she testified that the defendant had a problem with sweating, left his motor home unlocked on occasions, left a garden hose out in front of his home and became stuck in the sand in his motor home during trips to Glamis.

Prosecutor Jeff Dusek's line of questioning eventually led to the defendant's behavior after he began drinking.

"He would become very quiet," she said.

"What else," Dusek said.

"Sometimes he would become a little upset."

"Depressed?"

"Yes."

"Basically, you would see a change in character when he would drink."

"Yes."

After agreeing with Dusek that the defendant was much different while drinking than when sober, the prosecutor asked if it was one of the reasons she eventually left Westerfield.

"Because of the drinking? Yes," she answered quietly.

Dusek later provided Susan L. with a transcript of a statement to investigators in which she reportedly said that Westerfield would become "forceful," when he drank.

"I remember that occasionally," she said.

Westerfield told investigators he had been drinking the night he visited Dad's in Poway, the same night he encountered the victim's mother, Brenda van Dam, and her friends.

Earlier during Dusek's cross-examination, "Susan L." began crying on the witness stand, admitting that she still cares for the defendant.

"Susan L." testified that she had just broken up with the defendant when she saw on television that he was a suspect in the second-grader's disappearance Feb. 2.

Dusek asked her about the last time she had seen Westerfield.

"You still like him, don't you?"Dusek asked her.

"I care about him,"she said, sobbing.

The witness said she spoke with Westerfield the day after she had been out with a male friend.

Dusek showed "Susan L." a transcript of her Feb. 5 interview with police. The prosecutor asked the witness if she saw the defendant the night she went out with the other male friend.

"Did you tell law enforcement that you saw (the defendant) sitting outside?"' the prosecutor asked. The witness later testified under questioning from defense attorney Robert Boyce, that it was something Westerfield had told her.

Dusek attempted to turn that statement against the defense, asking if Westerfield had contacted her the next day.

"Yes, he called me."

"After discussing what was discussed, you didn't feel comfortable with the defendant at that time, correct," Dusek said.

"At the time, yes."

Initial testimony

The woman, under direction examination by Boyce, testified that she met Westerfield through Glennie Nasland, another defense witness, at Big Stone Lodge in Poway "three-and-a-half, four years ago."

They started dating and she moved in with him about two weeks later, she said.

They camped often in the motor home, sometimes accompanied by her daughters, her daughter's fiance and Westerfield's son.

Their journeys woud take them to the Silver Strand, Anza-Borrego and Glamis. Sometimes, when the weather was bad, they would leave the Silver Strand and travel to Borrego intead, she said.

It wasn't unusual for them to arrive at night, or search for friends and not find them, she said.

Before the trips, she would help load the motor home, she said, leaving it parked either across the street or in the home's driveway and leaving its front door open.. The motor home would often sit there for up to two days before the trips, she said.

It wasn't unusual for a hose to be left out in the front yard or for Westerfield to walk around with cash in his pocket, she said.

The motor home also would become stuck in the sand during their desert trips, "Susan L." said. "He would try to dig out the sand from the out from under the wheels and fit a board underneath," she said.

She testified he would leave the wood behind.

Later, she testified that Westerfield's son, Neal, was familiar with computers and would often help his father with them.

She also said the defendant had a problem with sweating, often under his arm pits head and face, even during cold weather.

Prosecution witnesses have testified that they thought it was unusual for Westerfield to be sweating profusely when they first contacted him in February.

Routes not uncommon

Meandering journeys in a motor home -- such as the one described by Westerfield -- are not so uncommon, according to one enthusiast who testified today.

Eugene Yale, an East County attorney and motor home enthusiast, came to the attention of defense lawyers when he wrote a letter to the defense to point the meandering nature of motor home trips. He did so because he had read a newspaper article about testimony in the case and "didn't think it was accurate."

"I'm here because I think the truth should be out," Yale told Westerfield attorney Steven Feldman, at the end of his testimony today.

Yale described several meandering routes to Glamis, including one similar to the route Westerfield told investigators he took on the same weekend that Danielle van Dam disappeared from her bedroom in the middle of the night.

"One of the joys of having a motor home is you don't have to rely on rest stops, restaurants or Jack in the Box, though I seldom pass one by," Yale said. "You can take the back roads, look at scenic areas. My wife and I have a motor home because we like to see things, and not to get stuck by clinging to one standard route."

Prosecutors have made much of a roaming route that Westerfield took through San Diego and Imperial counties in his motor home the weekend of Feb. 2. Westerfield told investigators the solo trip took him to Silver Strand State Beach; then east across the desert to Glamis where he got stuck in the sand; then moving on to Superstition Mountain, Borrego Springs and back to Silver Strand, where he parked on a street overnight before returning home to Sabre Springs in Poway on Monday morning.

"The scenery on (Interstate) 8 and toward Jacumba and the desert is not the most appealing," Yale said. "An alternative route is go up through Ramona, San Ysabel -- that way."

Generally, Yale added, he would take one way heading toward Glamis and return by a different route "just for a change of scene."

Avoiding crowds

Yale further testified that when he traveled to Glamis, he avoids crowds. "I set up away from people," he said on direct examination.

It was also not unusual to keep windows closed at times, Yale said. "A windshield on a motor home is pretty big -- and I've logged over 100,000 miles in them -- people have a natural tendency to look in, see what's going on."

Sunlight also tends to damage interior furniture, he said. In addition, shades drawn on windshields and sides reduce glare for his wife and children who enjoy watching videos.

Motion denied

Before court adjourned on Tuesday, Superior Court Judge William Mudd denied a defense motion to acquit Westerfield on the charges, that possession of child pornography.

Mudd noted that the defense motion ``brings to the court the question of whether or not, in the best light possible given to the prosecution's evidence, is there sufficient evidence to go to the jury from the question of the guilt or innocence of Mr. Westerfield on charges he is facing?

``The answer to that question is yes,'' Mudd said, answering his own rhetorical question. ``The motion is denied.''

Police criminalist Tanya DuLaney testified yesterday that blue fibers found in Westerfield's motorhome match fibers found around the body of the victim and on clothes in his washing machine.

DuLaney said she found a total of 46 blue fibers while examining the 1997 Southwind motorhome Feb. 6, four days after the second-grader was discovered missing from her Sabre Springs home.

Eleven blue nylon fibers were found on the headboard of the bed at the back of the vehicle, DuLaney said, with 31 discovered on bench seats, one on a front passenger seat and the rest on a couch.

Father wants back in court

Damon van Dam has filed a motion to be readmitted into the trial of his daughter's accused killer, Judge William Mudd said today.

The judge barred the father from the courtroom and third floor of the San Diego County Courthouse on June 25 because he said Damon van Dam was stalking and trying to stare down Westerfield.

At the time, Mudd said he had reached the limit with the father and told him to leave.

Mudd said he will consider Damon van Dam's motion tomorrow.

Baseball's 'sorry state'

The 7-7 tie in the Major League Baseball All-Star game Tuesday night prompted the judge to comment today on what he called the "sorry state of professional baseball."

Mudd was unhappy that Commissioner Bud Selig decided to call the game after 11 innings because the National and American league managers had told him that they had run out of players.

"It sure lets you know where the fans fit in," Mudd told jurors before testimony began.

The judge also reminded the jury that they would be off next week because Mudd had a prepaid and long-standing vacation planned by his wife of 30 years.

Mudd said the break would be good for jurors since the end of the case would be "intense."

"The pundits are telling me you're all a bunch of idiots," the judge said, referring to some criticism that the week-long break is going to leave jurors with an impression that the last witnesses who testify would be the best witnesses.

Mudd said the break would actually work to jurors' benefits.

"This actually is going to work out to your benefit."

"Get back to know your boss, your co-workers, spend time with your families," Mudd said. "Take a vacation. This is going to work to your benefit. It allows you a bit of a break before the end of the trial. The end of the trial will be intense."


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: 180frank; damonvandam; westerfield
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380381-400401-420 ... 1,301-1,318 next last
To: All
The Van Dams themselves had a blue car of this shade, which DVD has carefully gotten rid of since these events, and any blue auto-uph. fibers ought to be traced to her own car, the one she rides in daily, not to a mh she played in a few times in her life.
381 posted on 07/11/2002 2:10:21 PM PDT by crystalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 351 | View Replies]

To: Rheo
Just too many things don't add up...the prosecution offered no answers to them.

  Agree. Now, you'd wanted me to continue with the prosecution's side on two questions - I'm afraid I can only do one.

  You'd first asked me to clarify the timeline the prosecution is using, and mentioned some specific events at 3:00 and 3:30. I'm afraid I have no idea at all. I assume the prosecution has actually put forward an estimate? I really don't know on this one. I'd guess they're just saying, "sometime that night" and allowing that there was, at some point, sufficient time for some on to get in and out. I would still tend to expect more physical evidence from this, especially if it's rushed, but that's why I tend to think DAW didn't do it.

  Anyway, the other question is where is the blood, etc from Danielle. That one's a bit easier. The assumption would clearly be that he killed her somewhere outside the motor home during the trip. That evidence was not found, but on a wide ranging trip like he took, that is not surprising. I think that's why the prosecution took so much time showing the trip - it's length and rambling quality. Also, with so many back roads, it wouldn't be hard to be out of sight.

  If anyone else wants to chime in on the kidnapping timeline, feel free.

Drew Garrett

382 posted on 07/11/2002 2:11:24 PM PDT by agarrett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 371 | View Replies]

To: agarrett
Drew, in all sencerity, even your own take on the matter doesn't sound like like you think he did it "beyond a reasonable doubt", but "maybe he did it".

Keep reading the actual testimony, it will become as clear to you as it is to me that the prosecution has failed big time.

383 posted on 07/11/2002 2:12:01 PM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 352 | View Replies]

To: Rheo
It wasn't a difficult job, but yes, I'm now *more* confused, if that's possible.

No wonder I've skipped over all of the fiber testimony!

Someone help Rheo out here, will ya? I'm having a hard time focusing on evidence that either comes from lying VDs or possible cop plants. Would a cop really carry around a handful of fibers to drop on a suspect? Are they correct in figuring that DW's weak spot is laundry and housecleaning?

Is it just me, or is he looking less anal and just neat and tidy like an engineer? Is Stockholm Syndrome taking over?
384 posted on 07/11/2002 2:13:27 PM PDT by pinz-n-needlez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 364 | View Replies]

To: Rheo
I would also like to know who the woman was that DW saw when he went outside in the early morning hours of 2/2 and where was she when he saw her. Wonder why Keene/Redden (whoever) cut him off when he started to say that? Could have been someone leaving the VD house for all we know.
385 posted on 07/11/2002 2:13:28 PM PDT by Karson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 379 | View Replies]

To: Karson
What I don't get tho...is those orange fibers....with the theory of placement.

Why place the orange fibers in his laundry?....there was only 1 found on her...so how or why place them with such a minute amount found on her?...how would they know about an orange fiber if she hadn't been found yet?

Dang holes in theories.

386 posted on 07/11/2002 2:13:37 PM PDT by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 380 | View Replies]

To: hsmomx3
Did that help?
387 posted on 07/11/2002 2:13:49 PM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 366 | View Replies]

To: Rheo
The media is fickle.......Brenda could have lured them in one direction...while Damon went in another..

The media was not paid to keep an eye on them..they were paid to get a good story , or photo op

That could be why the body was found so late..no opportunity to dump before then

Was the media following the van ride on the 16th ?

388 posted on 07/11/2002 2:14:39 PM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 379 | View Replies]

To: John Jamieson
I am adding it to a nice formatted list.

But you have to supply me with the definition.

389 posted on 07/11/2002 2:16:11 PM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 375 | View Replies]

To: agarrett; All
With the assumption he killed her outside the MH on his trip...why bring her dead body back to Dehesa to dump?..why not leave her buried out in the desert somewhere?
390 posted on 07/11/2002 2:16:22 PM PDT by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 382 | View Replies]

To: John Jamieson
Drew, in all sencerity, even your own take on the matter doesn't sound like like you think he did it "beyond a reasonable doubt", but "maybe he did it".

  I don't think he did it at all.

Drew Garrett

391 posted on 07/11/2002 2:16:56 PM PDT by agarrett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 383 | View Replies]

To: FresnoDA
I am working on the DW TRial Thesaurus.

Your term "SLUT JACKALS", I need you to provide a definition.

392 posted on 07/11/2002 2:17:05 PM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 390 | View Replies]

To: All
Whomever came up with INSECTOPHILE, I need you to supply me with a definition for the DW TRIAL THREAD THESAURUS.
393 posted on 07/11/2002 2:17:42 PM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 392 | View Replies]

To: irish guard
Do you think the bug expert can testify as to whether married bugs "swing" or go to bars and try to pick up total strangers, ask them to go back to their house, so they can eat pizza, have sex and smoke bug pot together?

Hey, maybe Disney can do a version of this called "A Swinging Bug's Life". Of course, it would have to be r-rated.

394 posted on 07/11/2002 2:17:50 PM PDT by Slyfox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Karson
That interruption by Redden on that point has bothered me too...they didn't want any possible witness testimony..they wanted DW.
395 posted on 07/11/2002 2:18:04 PM PDT by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 385 | View Replies]

To: Rheo
How many dang comforters does this man have?

Susan L. testified that he uses two on the bed in MH. Does that help? 2 down, 36 to go? :-)

Maybe he had double comforters on some of the beds.

Something's been bugging me. When I end a big project, I tend to go on a cleaning spree to just get it all done, get the house back in order and start life anew. All his laundry-ing struck me as being that from early on. It sounds like this may have been his first trip since Susan left. Maybe he planned on washing that woman right out of his home/motor home. (A la South Pacific, Rogers&Hammerstein)

396 posted on 07/11/2002 2:18:19 PM PDT by pinz-n-needlez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 364 | View Replies]

To: agarrett
Whoops, sorry.
397 posted on 07/11/2002 2:18:52 PM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 391 | View Replies]

To: the-gooroo
. I know the dog doesn't bark (supposedly)

If you listen to the tapes of the 911 call from BRenda, the DOG (Layla, the peeing,barkless,dogbed-shredding, WONDER DOG) is clearly barking.

398 posted on 07/11/2002 2:19:10 PM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 376 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
Doesn't sound like the media was following DVD and friend on their little jaunt...we never heard or saw it.

Hopefully, Feldman has tracked and talked to all those places he said they put up flyers.(not that he has to disprove DVD's story but I'm not sure Feldman is not going to try and prove it.)

The only way his client will ever have a life again if found not guilty...is for the real perp to be exposed or enough stuff comes out that the investigation has to be relooked at.(still hoping for the Perry Mason moment, I guess)

399 posted on 07/11/2002 2:22:01 PM PDT by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 388 | View Replies]

To: Karson
I gaspped at that too! He just wanted to know about kids on the street.

I never heard of cutting a willing witness off like that. Aren't you supposed to just let them talk and talk.

Unless there is something you don't want on the record!
400 posted on 07/11/2002 2:22:28 PM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 385 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380381-400401-420 ... 1,301-1,318 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson