Agree. Now, you'd wanted me to continue with the prosecution's side on two questions - I'm afraid I can only do one.
You'd first asked me to clarify the timeline the prosecution is using, and mentioned some specific events at 3:00 and 3:30. I'm afraid I have no idea at all. I assume the prosecution has actually put forward an estimate? I really don't know on this one. I'd guess they're just saying, "sometime that night" and allowing that there was, at some point, sufficient time for some on to get in and out. I would still tend to expect more physical evidence from this, especially if it's rushed, but that's why I tend to think DAW didn't do it.
Anyway, the other question is where is the blood, etc from Danielle. That one's a bit easier. The assumption would clearly be that he killed her somewhere outside the motor home during the trip. That evidence was not found, but on a wide ranging trip like he took, that is not surprising. I think that's why the prosecution took so much time showing the trip - it's length and rambling quality. Also, with so many back roads, it wouldn't be hard to be out of sight.
If anyone else wants to chime in on the kidnapping timeline, feel free.
Drew Garrett
A question for you sir.
If true, then why didn't he leave her body where he killed her?
Did he stick her back in the MH and drive around with a dead body for a while?
Wouldn't there be more evidence in the MH if he did so?
Wouldn't the cadaver dogs have hit on an area in the MH if he did so?
If she were alive in the motor home, the dog would have alerted inside the motor home. Your assumption is not valid.