Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Expert: Body dumped after defendant fell under suspicion (SO WHO DUMPED DANIELLE VAN DAM'S BODY??)
Union Trib ^ | July 11, 2002 | Steve Perez/Greg Magnus

Posted on 07/11/2002 6:47:45 AM PDT by FresnoDA

Expert: Body dumped after defendant fell under suspicion

by Steve Perez
and
Greg Magnus
SIGNONSANDIEGO

July 10, 2002


Union-Tribune
Susan L. describes her relationship to David Westerfield.
An expert witness called by the defense Wednesday afternoon said he is "very confident" the nude body of Danielle van Dam was probably dumped off Dehesa Road near El Cajon more than a week after murder defendant David Westerfield came under police surveillance.

Insect expert David Faulkner testified he based his conclusion upon studies he conducted on larvae and insects recovered from the victim's body, discovered by volunteer searchers on Feb. 27.

Westerfield is accused of kidnapping 7-year-old Danielle van Dam from the child's bed and killing her five months ago. He could face the death penalty if convicted. This was the final day of defense testimony.

Based on Faulkner's studies, which use the life cycles of insects, the earliest the body could have been left there was Feb. 16 to Feb. 18, he said under questioning from Westerfield's defense attorney.

Earlier Wednesday, San Diego police detective Sgt. Bill Holmes testified that investigators placed a tracking device on Westerfield's car during the first days of the investigation. They tracked his movements until his arrest on Feb. 22.

Defense attorney Steven Feldman has said Westerfield would have had no opportunity to dispose of the body because he was under constant police surveillance from Feb. 4 until his arrest Feb. 22.

A medical examiner relies on three factors to make an assessment, Faulkner has said: the amount and distribution of rigor mortis, the change in body temperature and the degree of decomposition. But after several days, rigor mortis dissipates and the corpse assumes the temperature of its environment.

Insects can give more specific information because they have a definitive development period that can be meticulously measured, said Faulkner, who collected insects during Danielle's autopsy. Faulkner said the presence of specific fly larva and adults and the absence of beetle larva on the body helped him determine an approximate "post-mortem interval."

Faulkner said during normal daylight conditions flies can land upon a body and deposit eggs within 20 minutes of its death. He believed the body had been at its Dehesa location approximately 10-12 days before its discovery.

He admitted under cross-examination by prosecutor Jeff Dusek that weather conditions for February were "extremely abnormal" and could have affected the amount of insects available to find the body.

"There was very warm temperatures in February and no significant rainfall for most of the winter," Faulkner said. "The insect population in general was much lower."

Change of character

A woman who once lived with David Westerfield told prosecutors the defendant's character would change after drinking and he would become "forceful."

"Susan L." mother of "Danielle L.," and Christine Gonzales, both of whom testified earlier, lived with the defendant for nearly a year, beginning about 3 1/2 years ago. The woman's last name was not read into the court record because her daughter, a minor, testified Tuesday.

Before he was charged in February, Westerfield's criminal record consisted of a 1996 drunken-driving conviction.

The woman was called initially as a witness for the defense, during which she testified that the defendant had a problem with sweating, left his motor home unlocked on occasions, left a garden hose out in front of his home and became stuck in the sand in his motor home during trips to Glamis.

Prosecutor Jeff Dusek's line of questioning eventually led to the defendant's behavior after he began drinking.

"He would become very quiet," she said.

"What else," Dusek said.

"Sometimes he would become a little upset."

"Depressed?"

"Yes."

"Basically, you would see a change in character when he would drink."

"Yes."

After agreeing with Dusek that the defendant was much different while drinking than when sober, the prosecutor asked if it was one of the reasons she eventually left Westerfield.

"Because of the drinking? Yes," she answered quietly.

Dusek later provided Susan L. with a transcript of a statement to investigators in which she reportedly said that Westerfield would become "forceful," when he drank.

"I remember that occasionally," she said.

Westerfield told investigators he had been drinking the night he visited Dad's in Poway, the same night he encountered the victim's mother, Brenda van Dam, and her friends.

Earlier during Dusek's cross-examination, "Susan L." began crying on the witness stand, admitting that she still cares for the defendant.

"Susan L." testified that she had just broken up with the defendant when she saw on television that he was a suspect in the second-grader's disappearance Feb. 2.

Dusek asked her about the last time she had seen Westerfield.

"You still like him, don't you?"Dusek asked her.

"I care about him,"she said, sobbing.

The witness said she spoke with Westerfield the day after she had been out with a male friend.

Dusek showed "Susan L." a transcript of her Feb. 5 interview with police. The prosecutor asked the witness if she saw the defendant the night she went out with the other male friend.

"Did you tell law enforcement that you saw (the defendant) sitting outside?"' the prosecutor asked. The witness later testified under questioning from defense attorney Robert Boyce, that it was something Westerfield had told her.

Dusek attempted to turn that statement against the defense, asking if Westerfield had contacted her the next day.

"Yes, he called me."

"After discussing what was discussed, you didn't feel comfortable with the defendant at that time, correct," Dusek said.

"At the time, yes."

Initial testimony

The woman, under direction examination by Boyce, testified that she met Westerfield through Glennie Nasland, another defense witness, at Big Stone Lodge in Poway "three-and-a-half, four years ago."

They started dating and she moved in with him about two weeks later, she said.

They camped often in the motor home, sometimes accompanied by her daughters, her daughter's fiance and Westerfield's son.

Their journeys woud take them to the Silver Strand, Anza-Borrego and Glamis. Sometimes, when the weather was bad, they would leave the Silver Strand and travel to Borrego intead, she said.

It wasn't unusual for them to arrive at night, or search for friends and not find them, she said.

Before the trips, she would help load the motor home, she said, leaving it parked either across the street or in the home's driveway and leaving its front door open.. The motor home would often sit there for up to two days before the trips, she said.

It wasn't unusual for a hose to be left out in the front yard or for Westerfield to walk around with cash in his pocket, she said.

The motor home also would become stuck in the sand during their desert trips, "Susan L." said. "He would try to dig out the sand from the out from under the wheels and fit a board underneath," she said.

She testified he would leave the wood behind.

Later, she testified that Westerfield's son, Neal, was familiar with computers and would often help his father with them.

She also said the defendant had a problem with sweating, often under his arm pits head and face, even during cold weather.

Prosecution witnesses have testified that they thought it was unusual for Westerfield to be sweating profusely when they first contacted him in February.

Routes not uncommon

Meandering journeys in a motor home -- such as the one described by Westerfield -- are not so uncommon, according to one enthusiast who testified today.

Eugene Yale, an East County attorney and motor home enthusiast, came to the attention of defense lawyers when he wrote a letter to the defense to point the meandering nature of motor home trips. He did so because he had read a newspaper article about testimony in the case and "didn't think it was accurate."

"I'm here because I think the truth should be out," Yale told Westerfield attorney Steven Feldman, at the end of his testimony today.

Yale described several meandering routes to Glamis, including one similar to the route Westerfield told investigators he took on the same weekend that Danielle van Dam disappeared from her bedroom in the middle of the night.

"One of the joys of having a motor home is you don't have to rely on rest stops, restaurants or Jack in the Box, though I seldom pass one by," Yale said. "You can take the back roads, look at scenic areas. My wife and I have a motor home because we like to see things, and not to get stuck by clinging to one standard route."

Prosecutors have made much of a roaming route that Westerfield took through San Diego and Imperial counties in his motor home the weekend of Feb. 2. Westerfield told investigators the solo trip took him to Silver Strand State Beach; then east across the desert to Glamis where he got stuck in the sand; then moving on to Superstition Mountain, Borrego Springs and back to Silver Strand, where he parked on a street overnight before returning home to Sabre Springs in Poway on Monday morning.

"The scenery on (Interstate) 8 and toward Jacumba and the desert is not the most appealing," Yale said. "An alternative route is go up through Ramona, San Ysabel -- that way."

Generally, Yale added, he would take one way heading toward Glamis and return by a different route "just for a change of scene."

Avoiding crowds

Yale further testified that when he traveled to Glamis, he avoids crowds. "I set up away from people," he said on direct examination.

It was also not unusual to keep windows closed at times, Yale said. "A windshield on a motor home is pretty big -- and I've logged over 100,000 miles in them -- people have a natural tendency to look in, see what's going on."

Sunlight also tends to damage interior furniture, he said. In addition, shades drawn on windshields and sides reduce glare for his wife and children who enjoy watching videos.

Motion denied

Before court adjourned on Tuesday, Superior Court Judge William Mudd denied a defense motion to acquit Westerfield on the charges, that possession of child pornography.

Mudd noted that the defense motion ``brings to the court the question of whether or not, in the best light possible given to the prosecution's evidence, is there sufficient evidence to go to the jury from the question of the guilt or innocence of Mr. Westerfield on charges he is facing?

``The answer to that question is yes,'' Mudd said, answering his own rhetorical question. ``The motion is denied.''

Police criminalist Tanya DuLaney testified yesterday that blue fibers found in Westerfield's motorhome match fibers found around the body of the victim and on clothes in his washing machine.

DuLaney said she found a total of 46 blue fibers while examining the 1997 Southwind motorhome Feb. 6, four days after the second-grader was discovered missing from her Sabre Springs home.

Eleven blue nylon fibers were found on the headboard of the bed at the back of the vehicle, DuLaney said, with 31 discovered on bench seats, one on a front passenger seat and the rest on a couch.

Father wants back in court

Damon van Dam has filed a motion to be readmitted into the trial of his daughter's accused killer, Judge William Mudd said today.

The judge barred the father from the courtroom and third floor of the San Diego County Courthouse on June 25 because he said Damon van Dam was stalking and trying to stare down Westerfield.

At the time, Mudd said he had reached the limit with the father and told him to leave.

Mudd said he will consider Damon van Dam's motion tomorrow.

Baseball's 'sorry state'

The 7-7 tie in the Major League Baseball All-Star game Tuesday night prompted the judge to comment today on what he called the "sorry state of professional baseball."

Mudd was unhappy that Commissioner Bud Selig decided to call the game after 11 innings because the National and American league managers had told him that they had run out of players.

"It sure lets you know where the fans fit in," Mudd told jurors before testimony began.

The judge also reminded the jury that they would be off next week because Mudd had a prepaid and long-standing vacation planned by his wife of 30 years.

Mudd said the break would be good for jurors since the end of the case would be "intense."

"The pundits are telling me you're all a bunch of idiots," the judge said, referring to some criticism that the week-long break is going to leave jurors with an impression that the last witnesses who testify would be the best witnesses.

Mudd said the break would actually work to jurors' benefits.

"This actually is going to work out to your benefit."

"Get back to know your boss, your co-workers, spend time with your families," Mudd said. "Take a vacation. This is going to work to your benefit. It allows you a bit of a break before the end of the trial. The end of the trial will be intense."


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: 180frank; damonvandam; westerfield
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,101-1,1201,121-1,1401,141-1,160 ... 1,301-1,318 next last
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
If the kids seriously did not know what the parents did.. SNIP...do you agree that they could have led a secret lifestyle from their kids?

I thought my husband and I led a secret life until my daughter told me that they knew what we were doing in the bedroom when we locked our door! Oooooo boy!

1,121 posted on 07/11/2002 11:17:17 PM PDT by It's me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 872 | View Replies]

To: pyx
I agree totally.

Remember this (NCT 2/17):
"Although we are searching out here in the desert areas, I don't want people to stop searching San Diego," said Damon van Dam, who also spent part of Saturday recruiting more people to help search for his daughter.

1,122 posted on 07/11/2002 11:21:11 PM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1119 | View Replies]

For what it's worth:

I heard on the local news here in San Diego that the Van Dams spokesman said that the Van Dams had NOT signed a book deal and that they have NOT bought a million dollar home. And that rumors alluding to such were dishonoring the memory of Danielle.
1,123 posted on 07/11/2002 11:21:13 PM PDT by It's me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 872 | View Replies]

To: It's me
$850,000 is not a million, he's right.
1,124 posted on 07/11/2002 11:24:35 PM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1123 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama; Rheo; All
Dusek questioning Denise:

Q: DID THERE COME A TIME AT DAD'S THAT EVENING WHEN YOU BECAME AWARE THAT MR. WESTERFIELD WAS NO LONGER AROUND?

A: LATER ON THAT EVENING I HEARD THAT HE WAS -- HE HAD LEFT.


I've said it before... I'll say it again. If Denise and party wasn't interested in DW and "not paying attention" to him, why were they discussing whether or not DW had left the bar?
1,125 posted on 07/11/2002 11:24:59 PM PDT by Karson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1120 | View Replies]

To: It's me
and that they have NOT bought a million dollar home. And that rumors alluding to such were dishonoring the memory of Danielle.

I had heard that it was only $850K, not quite one million, so I guess technically, what they said could be correct. Also, they may not have signed a book deal--yet. I know I sound cynical, but I can't seem to believe anything they say.

1,126 posted on 07/11/2002 11:26:52 PM PDT by sbnsd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1123 | View Replies]

To: Karson
Because they had to pay for their own drinks?
1,127 posted on 07/11/2002 11:26:58 PM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1125 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama
Maybe that's why Barb isn't testifying?

Here's some more wild speculation with absolutely no basis on my part as to why Barb maybe hasn't testified yet.

Maybe its because the defense is saving her for near the end of this phase of the trial. Perhaps she will exercise her 5th Amendment Right against self-incrimination. This would work very well in favor of the defense.

Or perhaps she will testify that Danielle was not even at home in the early hours of February 2, 2002 because while she went upstairs, maybe it was Barbara E. who closed Danielle's door on the way to the masterbedroom for sex with Damon but she first checked and found that Danielle was not even there.
What if this was a faked kidnapping to collect insurance money that went wrong ?
1,128 posted on 07/11/2002 11:26:59 PM PDT by pyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1120 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama
It's hard to say what they were doing or did....it is not hard to imagine them doing more than smoking pot.

When Rich said he gave BVD the pot in an envelope, as opposed to a baggy, cocaine was my first thought.

DVD has put on weight since then...did he have to get clean?

Did Danielle find something in the MB she wasn't supposed to and took it and died?

Did someone give her something intentionally? (that is harder to imagine but possible)

If DW was slipped something, it would have had to be close to the time he left (12am)...Glennie said BVD was at the bar when she left at 1am...so not sure it works.(IIRC on the times)

1,129 posted on 07/11/2002 11:28:02 PM PDT by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1120 | View Replies]

To: sbnsd
The book deal has NOT been signed and the house is only $850,000. To say otherwise is to defame Danielle ....... I love the spin masters.
1,130 posted on 07/11/2002 11:29:06 PM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1126 | View Replies]

To: fnord
Submitted for your consideration: THREADJACKAL
SJA
1,131 posted on 07/11/2002 11:30:21 PM PDT by 185JHP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 740 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
Here is the motion.

April 15, 2002 (page 2)

"Later, the attorneys indicated they intended to proffer their client's intoxication as an affirmative Defense; that is, if he committed the crime, he was intoxicated."

This is the actual phrasing from the motion. If you want more go to the website for yourself.
1,132 posted on 07/11/2002 11:30:32 PM PDT by truth_seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 742 | View Replies]

To: pyx
You can't collect without a body.
1,133 posted on 07/11/2002 11:31:05 PM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1128 | View Replies]

To: Karson
I agree Karson....why were they paying attention to him?

And why did Denise not mention DW's name at all on 2/3 or that afternoon conversation "I left at 9" to any of the interrogators?

A: LATER ON THAT EVENING I HEARD THAT HE WAS -- HE HAD LEFT.

Heard that he was...what?...the "he had left" part is an add on.....did she hear something back at the house?

1,134 posted on 07/11/2002 11:33:18 PM PDT by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1125 | View Replies]

To: sbnsd
Listen here Ms. Cynical...just cuz someone lies repeatedly doesn't mean you can't believe them once in awhile!! :-)
1,135 posted on 07/11/2002 11:34:32 PM PDT by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1126 | View Replies]

To: John Jamieson
Yup, you and I are on the same page.
1,136 posted on 07/11/2002 11:35:33 PM PDT by sbnsd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1130 | View Replies]

To: John Jamieson
Because they had to pay for their own drinks?

Or maybe they wanted/needed to know his whereabouts for some reason? Maybe they were concerned and wanted to make sure he arrived home safely. I keep remembering one of the men in the party mentioning Brenda's car/truck being parked in a different space at the end of the evening. Did she leave for a short time and then return to Dad's? Why?

1,137 posted on 07/11/2002 11:37:30 PM PDT by Karson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1127 | View Replies]

To: Rheo
I did believe them once in awhile. I believed them when they said Danielle was missing, and that Brenda went for a girls' night out 2 weeks in a row. Um... what else...? I guess that was about it.
1,138 posted on 07/11/2002 11:38:28 PM PDT by sbnsd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1135 | View Replies]

To: Karson
Scroll past the ones that make your pulse rate go up. Works for me. :-)

Works for me, too! ;)

1,139 posted on 07/11/2002 11:40:18 PM PDT by It's me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1016 | View Replies]

To: Rheo
Uh huh ... I wonder what she was about to say she HEARD THAT HE WAS? And who was it that she heard it from? hmmm
1,140 posted on 07/11/2002 11:41:44 PM PDT by Karson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1134 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,101-1,1201,121-1,1401,141-1,160 ... 1,301-1,318 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson