A Bush Hater's Poll

Jim Robinson

[Jim Robinson]

This is an unofficial quick and dirty presidential poll. Apparently, there is a good sized contingent on Free Republic that believes that President Bush is:

1. Not conservative enough
2. Not pro-life
3. Is a gun-grabber
4. Is a federal power-grabber
5. Will appoint liberal judges
6. Is a globalist
7. Is in it just for oil
8. Is too soft on immigration
9. Is too soft (or too hard) on Israel
10. Is a crook
11. All of the above
12. None of the above
13. Other (you name it)

Please list the numbers that best match the reasons you don't like Bush (or state other reasons if not on the list) and state whether you believe that President Bush should be defeated even if it means installing a Democrat in the Whitehouse.

Conversely, if you believe President Bush should be re-elected, please state why.

Please state who you would like to see win the Presidency in 2004 and whether or not you believe he/she has a chance of winning.

Thanks,
Jim

[habs4ever]

lol ;-)

[ned]

Not posting on this threadis much an admission of guilt as posting on it.

ROFL

[FreedominJesusChrist]

Regards back to you too. Haven't seen you around lately...

[Howlin]

I see a night's sleep didn't help your disposition.

So, do you agree with Klayman that Cheney is the REAL president of the U.S.?

[RedBloodedAmerican]

You seemed to be saying in your post you weighed in (un-cozily, if that's a word) as a Bush Hater, but then said you aren't, but then fit in with others who are?

The original post stated "Conversely, if you believe President Bush should be re-elected, please state why.", and you will see my direct replies to it if you search.

My this thread is intersting. And quiet!

[KansasGirl]

#1 Of course, there are very few politicians out there who are.
#8 This is the BIGGIE with me. I have a REAL problem with Bush's pandering to the illegals!!
#13 Bush's signing of the Anti-Constitutional CFR.

That being said, I am not a Bush hater. I will probably vote for him in the next election because having a Gore, Hillary, Daschle, Lieberman, etc. as President is unacceptable.

[Askel5]

You replied to the terms I used in my post, not to the title of the thread.

I replied to the thread because you pinged me.

Not only did I take specific umbrage to the title of the thread but I complied with the questions -- all, I believe -- it posed.

After all, it's the Owner's thread.

Try to stay on topic.

[deport]

Oh, I got a 'drop it' so awareness exist now. No vote.... no complaint

[ArneFufkin]

Remember, don't ever never lose your enthusiasm, ok?

[Howlin]

This thread is 'boob-bait for bubbas'...

And you are here because of what?

[B Knotts]

Well, assuming he doesn't do anything bizarre, like run Tom Ridge as VP, I will be volunteering for him again in 2004. The disagreements I may have with Pres. Bush from time to time do not justify opposing him, IMO.

[FreedominJesusChrist]

"Comeon Askole, you need some new stuff."

That wasn't funny.

[RedBloodedAmerican]

Try to stay on topic.

BWAAHAHAH!

Thanks!

[EternalVigilance]

You remain in my top five of least favorite, most divisive FReepers.

[RedBloodedAmerican]

Wow, you caught a typo of mine, thanks!

[RedBloodedAmerican]

But I still am not listed amongst the top ten at the Liberty site you guys go to and biatchandmoan about FR, so I have to try harder.

At least I am not dividing the party *cough*

[FreedominJesusChrist]

This is not the appropriate thread for that discussion, HOWLIN.

[Amelia]

Are you a playa hata too?

You might ought to frame the question differently. I doubt Askel5 speaks ghetto.

[habs4ever]

I sure would make a greater effort to read and comprehend your posts, if you would be good enough to make brevity your friend.Do we have a deal??

If you can say in 30 words what normally takes you 750, then your points would carry impact.I wonder how many now just pass your stuff by??

[Howlin]

It is if you don't think George W. Bush is the legitimate president of the United States.

Well? Do you agree with him or not?