Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Bush Hater's Poll
Jim Robinson

Posted on 07/10/2002 11:27:06 PM PDT by Jim Robinson

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 1,421-1,426 next last
To: Texasforever; MissAmericanPie
If Bush did what it took to get control of the Border and the existing illegal alien population, you would rue the day that you championed it.

What utter BS.

If Bush would let the INS enforce the laws on the books right now, we could have this problem cleaned up in a few years, without any more of an inconvenience to the citizens than there is now.

121 posted on 07/11/2002 12:43:19 AM PDT by Marine Inspector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
A Bush Hater's Poll

A hater? With all due respect, was't that term used as a tool against those who pointed out x42's numerous faults and crimes?

That being said, I miss the days of gridlock, before steel tariffs, lumber duties, out of control farm subsidies, out of control federal funding of education, CFR, the demonization of american businesses, and the elevation of federal departments as the white knights.

I miss having a conservative president who wouldn't have left fellow conservatives like Judge Pickering, Bret Schundler, and Bill Simon twisting in the wind. I miss having a president who promoted investment and the power of american innovation and risk taking, rather than jumping on the leftist bandwagon, which can only harp on the negative aspects of capitalism. I miss having a conservative who used the power of the presidential bully pulpit to beat back the Rats, rather than outspending them for our votes.

122 posted on 07/11/2002 12:43:38 AM PDT by Moonman62
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
#8 and at times #9.

I would vote for another candidate in a heartbeat against Bush if I thought he had a chance to win, but there haven't been any. I don't like the Bushes. I don't hate rich people. I don't begrudge people for being succesful. I just don't like political dynasties, be it the Kennedies, Bushes or Gores. Every man has a right to run in this great Republic of ours, but I prefer not to vote for someone who was born to be groomed to run.

I like candidates such as Ronald Reagan, who rose from normal America. I respect the Trumans, Reagans, Cincinnatus'es of the history of statesmen.

All this doesn't mean I won't support Bush though. The only candidates ready to face him are people with little to no chance of winning, or narcissists such as McCain. If this stays this way in 2004 I will support and vote for GW.

123 posted on 07/11/2002 12:44:25 AM PDT by ChicagoRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
Nobody is prepared for the presidency and I am perfectly fine with a president gathering a great group of advisors to help him out. He ran the executive office of one of the most populated states. I would say that is all the preparation needed.

------------------

Presidente Fox, Hillary, Bubba, the corrupt African staes now promised more foreign aid, and the Chinese all agree with you.

124 posted on 07/11/2002 12:44:39 AM PDT by RLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
In any case, I don't think the election would have been as close as it was but for the "compassionate conservative" posturing. I think it cost more votes than it won

Really? Oh well, I guess you just ignore reality that the things that concerned most people the most in 2000 was health care and education.(9/11 made fighting terrorism the #1 priority, today)

Oh yeah a candidate that said screw you would have won by a landslide.

125 posted on 07/11/2002 12:45:47 AM PDT by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: carpio
Why can't the GOP seem to field someone who will stand up for America

We don't own the tools of propaganda.

The communists understood about propaganda. For over a half century they have infiltrated and they now dominate all the propaganda organs in this country....the movies, the schools, the press, television programs and news...

Until we get back in the game in a truly meaningful way, we can not field a truly conservative candidate who can win.

126 posted on 07/11/2002 12:46:38 AM PDT by patriciaruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Marine Inspector
If Bush would let the INS enforce the laws on the books right now, we could have this problem cleaned up in a few years, without any more of an inconvenience to the citizens than there is now.

What laws on the books are being ignored by Bush?

127 posted on 07/11/2002 12:46:39 AM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Jim,

President Bush is not perfect. The decision to to back down on the World Court was especially egregious.

But, he is a decent man, a good man.

This is what we used to have:


This is who we now have as our President:

If you all want perfection, the only person who fills those shoes is Jesus Christ. For now, we have a good man in the White House.

128 posted on 07/11/2002 12:46:59 AM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RLK
Well, that will not be happening by 2004.
129 posted on 07/11/2002 12:47:03 AM PDT by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Brownie74
We already know where you stand. No comment necessary.
130 posted on 07/11/2002 12:48:00 AM PDT by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Don Myers
Words are just words. His actions are what counts. Can you answer the question? I am really interested in this matter. You seem to have this inside track on President Bush.

So you can't back up your challenge . Why am I not surprised?

131 posted on 07/11/2002 12:48:38 AM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: jeremiah
Well, looks like you can't stand the thought that the war will be long-term.

I hope you get rounded up and deported with the rest of people like you.
132 posted on 07/11/2002 12:49:26 AM PDT by rwfromkansas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson; Texasforever
Ok, I just went back to see who the other person is who voted for Tancredo. And, the other person is a fourth generation Texan, Miss American Pie. Tancredo has national popularity. I am in South Dakota.
133 posted on 07/11/2002 12:49:33 AM PDT by Don Myers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
Based on what? His stance on immigration? What else qualifies him as a president?

I have no idea what kind of President Tancredo would make, but if he runs for the 2004 nomination I'd vote for him in the primary. Every vote he'd get would be a clear message to the President on his wayward track on Illegal Aliens, and one I'm not sure Bush has listened to yet.

Of course, Tancredo wouldn't get the nomination, so hopefully I'll be voting for an appropriately chastised Bush that November.




134 posted on 07/11/2002 12:49:36 AM PDT by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
I miss having a conservative president who wouldn't have left fellow conservatives like Judge Pickering, Bret Schundler, and Bill Simon twisting in the wind.

Huh??? Pickering had go against a demo judiciary panel. Schundler was running in a very liberal state and is not above criticism on how he ran his campaign, and Bill Simon is really twisting in the wind with a lead against Davis in most of the polls against Davis.

I knew that this thread would turn into a bash fest where facts are ignored.

135 posted on 07/11/2002 12:49:57 AM PDT by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
That is YOUR take on the situtation. We have fallen a long distance from "exempt us or shove it", to "well ok, you can bring our people before your court but you have to wait a year or more to being investigations".

What makes you think for one jumpin jack minute, given Bush's history, that he won't cave on our military? He has certainly opened the door for the next President to cave. Just like he left the door open for a broader range of stem cell research.

136 posted on 07/11/2002 12:50:03 AM PDT by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Not Gore
137 posted on 07/11/2002 12:50:05 AM PDT by Types_with_Fist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: MissAmericanPie
He's every bit as capable as GB to be President and not nearly as appeasing

Then you can post his non-immigration stances?

138 posted on 07/11/2002 12:50:22 AM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
What laws on the books are being ignored by Bush?

Let's start at the top. Bush appoints a open border liberal to run the INS, and that same open borders liberal publicly states that the INS will not go round up the 8 to 11 million illegals in the US and he is still in charge.

Actions speak louder than words. Bush does not want the illegals rounded up.

139 posted on 07/11/2002 12:50:45 AM PDT by Marine Inspector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
Why don't you visit his web site? He lists them all there.
140 posted on 07/11/2002 12:51:16 AM PDT by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 1,421-1,426 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson