Excuse me....but this is America....remember the old saying....."innocent until PROVEN guilty". It is the Prosecuter's job to SHOW HOW THE BLOOD GOT THERE....not DW's. What if this were you....you know you did not do it and you have no idea how her blood got there.....you'd be saying....prove it is there because of my actions. Why in this case, does he have to do the job of LE and figure out how it got there.....besides the obvious....he is trying to save his a$$ from an overzealous and incompetent prosecution.
Nowhere is it suggested that the amount of blood is sufficient to indicate any serious injury much less a cause of death, and the dogs refused to even indicate on the interior of the MH, suggesting that her presence there was quite a long time in the past.
Crappy erroneous blood tests are what led to the Lindy Chamberlain matter in Australia, which all on this thread ought to study up on, to see how public hysteria lynched an innocent woman there, and let it be a lesson to all in the Westerfield case.