[is_is]

I think the blood is impressive,I have great doubts about this case but unless they explain how this little girl's blood got there I think he is guilty.

Excuse me....but this is America....remember the old saying....."innocent until PROVEN guilty". It is the Prosecuter's job to SHOW HOW THE BLOOD GOT THERE....not DW's. What if this were you....you know you did not do it and you have no idea how her blood got there.....you'd be saying....prove it is there because of my actions. Why in this case, does he have to do the job of LE and figure out how it got there.....besides the obvious....he is trying to save his a$$ from an overzealous and incompetent prosecution.

[the Deejay]

"It is the Prosecuter's job to SHOW HOW THE BLOOD GOT THERE....not DW's."


Exactly! Now what American doesn't know that?

[gigi]

EXACTLY!!!
I'm not at all impressed with the amount of blood that was found.

I would think a reasonable explanation about the blood,
Danielle and friend ( or not) went in the MH without permission to see what was in there and her nose bled a drop fell on the floor and she wiped her finger on the jacket. Stranger things have happened.

But like you say the prosecution has to prove how it got there. I don't think they did. JMO

[fatima]

It does not matter what we think but what the jury thinks,if I were on the jury I would need to know how the little girl's blood got into his MH,was the blood on the jacket an old stain,if not then she would have had to been in there in a short time before she died.Many cases are won on spots the dry cleaner could not see.These questions are some of the ones I would have.