Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Defense could pin hopes on insect life..Westerfield Trial Breaking News: BUG EVIDENCE QUESTIONS!!
Union Tribune ^ | July 10, 2002 | Kristen Green

Posted on 07/10/2002 3:17:09 PM PDT by FresnoDA

Defense could pin hopes on insect life


By Kristen Green
STAFF WRITER

June 30, 2002Warble fly: pupa and adult


In the first four weeks of David Westerfield's murder trial, jurors were schooled in scientific evidence such as blood and DNA, fingerprints and fibers. Now they'll get a crash course in the life cycle of flies.

Westerfield's team of lawyers is expected to launch his defense this week, and lead attorney Steven Feldman has hinted that he will use insect biology to prove 7-year-old Danielle van Dam died after police and reporters began tracking his client's every move. That would mean Westerfield couldn't have killed the child.

"This would be very powerful evidence," said San Diego criminal defense lawyer Michael Pancer. "I can't think of what the state would say if this point were pinned."

Using forensic entomology, scientists can estimate when the girl died by determining the age of insects, generally flies, found on her body.

"They generally get to the body before police do, and they lay eggs," said Bernard Greenberg, professor emeritus of biological sciences at the University of Illinois at Chicago.

The prosecution may call the same expert to the witness stand.

Bots in the throat of a caribouBecause of the gag order in the case, no one can provide a timetable for witnesses, clarify facts or discuss strategy.

Feldman has raised the possibility that Danielle may have been killed up to two weeks after her mother reported her missing. Her body was dumped in a brushy rural area in East County.

"You're going to be convinced beyond any doubt that it was impossible, impossible for David Westerfield to have dumped Danielle van Dam in that location," he said on the first day of the trial.


Death's timetable
The jury has heard the prosecution's theory of Danielle's death from Dr. Brian Blackbourne, the county medical examiner. He testified that the girl's body could have been in the weeds along Dehesa Road 10 days to six weeks when it was found Feb. 27.
Forensic entomologists believe they can narrow that window of death, and coroners don't disagree.

Forensic entomology, the use of insects in legal cases, has gotten a boost in mainstream recognition from crime television shows such as CBS' "CSI: Crime Scene Investigation," whose main character frequently uses insects to solve crimes. NBC's "Crossing Jordan" also has an insect expert, nicknamed "Bug," in the cast.

In the real world, the application of forensic entomology to crime investigations has become more common since it was introduced in the United States in the 1970s.

Insect biology has been used in a number of San Diego County cases, including that of Daniel Rodrick, who was convicted in 1997 of killing his wife. An entomologist's testimony helped narrow the time that the victim's body probably was dumped in Pala.

The reason attorneys frequently use entomology is that establishing the time of death is difficult for medical examiners, said San Diego insect expert David Faulkner.

"After 24 to 48 hours, things start to get pretty fuzzy," he said.

A medical examiner relies on three factors to make an assessment, Faulkner said: the amount and distribution of rigor mortis, the change in body temperature and the degree of decomposition. But after several days, rigor mortis dissipates and the corpse assumes the temperature of its environment.

Insects can give more specific information because they have a definitive development period that can be meticulously measured, said Faulkner, who collected insects during Danielle's autopsy and is listed as a potential witness by the prosecution and the defense.

He said his testimony will probably be more useful for the defense, but added the gag order prevents him from discussing his findings outside court.

Faulkner described the collecting of insects from a body as painstaking, similar to the collecting of other scientific evidence.

Generally, he said, forensic entomologists go where a body is found and remove insects from the corpse and areas under and near it. They frequently focus on flies, but also look at other insects, including ants and beetles.

Most of the insects are preserved with alcohol so they can be studied later, Faulkner said. Some of the larvae collected are placed in containers with a piece of liver so they can grow to adulthood, which enables scientists to identify each insect with certainty.

The scientists gather climate data, such as daily temperatures and precipitation measurements, for the time the victim was missing.

Weather is important because a fly's development varies according to conditions. Humidity and daytime highs help forensic entomologists better pinpoint the time flies complete a life cycle.

"The insects will tell you when the body was available to them," Faulkner said.


Fly's life and times
Expert witness Jason Byrd, an associate professor at Virginia Commonwealth University in Richmond, Va., said making insects interesting to the jury is difficult.
Flies have a brief life span in warm weather, as short as 21 days. But they can live six months in colder weather.

They are attracted to the corpse's smell, and either lay eggs or deposit larvae. In about a day the eggs hatch into larvae, or maggots, which live on the dead tissue and develop quickly.

Depending on the species and temperature, eggs reach maturity, or the pre-pupal stage, in five to 12 days. From eggs, maggots feed on and then migrate from the body to form the pupal stage, similar to the cocoon stage of the butterfly.

After it leaves the body, a maggot shrinks in size, and the outer covering hardens into what looks like a miniature football. The adult fly develops in that football, called the pupae.

On average, it takes 14 to 24 days for the eggs to reach adult stage, depending on weather.

The longer a body has been left outside, the less precise an entomologist's estimated time of death.

A number of factors can delay insects from reaching a body. For example, burial in a shallow grave, strange weather or wrapping the body in a blanket can delay detection by insects for a few days.

"They'll get there, but they're not going to get there as quickly," said M. Lee Goff, one of eight certified forensic entomologists in the nation and chairman of the forensic sciences department at Chaminade University in Honolulu.

Danielle apparently wasn't wrapped in a blanket or buried in a shallow grave. However, Faulkner has described the weather in February as unusual.

Jurors in the Westerfield trial have heard powerful scientific evidence over the month the prosecution has been presenting its case. But their responsibility is to determine beyond a reasonable doubt whether Westerfield killed the girl, and the defense has not begun.

Witnesses for the prosecution have testified that DNA from a bloodstain on Westerfield's jacket and on the carpet in his motor home matches Danielle's. The victim's DNA was obtained from one of her ribs after the autopsy.

Jurors also have heard that a hair found on a bathmat in Westerfield's motor home could be hers, and DNA tests of a hair found in the motor home's sink drain matched her DNA.

Witnesses also testified that fibers wrapped around the victim's necklace matched fibers found in Westerfield's bedding and laundry, and an expert said two fingerprints found on a cabinet in his motor home were left by her.

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kristen Green: (619) 542-4576; kristen.green@uniontrib.com

 

Copyright 2002 Union-Tribune Publishing Co.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: 180frank; damonvandam; westerfield
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 781-790 next last
To: Henrietta
But the latest date seems kind of meaningless, since it could have been put there before the 16th, an indeterminable time before the 16th. This means that it could have been there on the 16th, or it could have been there on the 2nd, right? So I don't see how this testimony help DW at all. It just means that the body wasn't dumped after the 16th-18th of Feb.

I don't disagree, but Feldman got Faulkner to say that he only saw one generation of flies, which could support a conclusion that the body was disposed of around 2/16-18.

The real key is that there were no beetle larva in/on the body. This is what establishes the no earlier than date after a time that DW could have disposed of the body.

81 posted on 07/10/2002 4:23:52 PM PDT by connectthedots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
I just want someone to ask the bug guy - "Given the totality of the evidence you examined, and in your experienced expert opinion - when was her body placed at the recovery site?" Why can't it just be that simple?
82 posted on 07/10/2002 4:24:25 PM PDT by mommya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom
Plus Faulkner said that even in mummfication, flies would be on the inside. Dusak back on and on and on and........
83 posted on 07/10/2002 4:24:54 PM PDT by gigi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: connectthedots
If Faulkner had information that would have placed that body on Dehesa on 2/2-2/4, the prosecution would have put him on the stand. It would have been "the nail in the coffin", so to speak. They didn't want to use his testimony.

I think it was most telling that Faulkner was so puzzled by the bug activity/lack of bugs that he found, that he had to call the ME and ask if the body had been contained somehow.
84 posted on 07/10/2002 4:26:00 PM PDT by NatureGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: connectthedots
Feldman will ask one question that will seal the deal, "Mr. Faulkner, have you ever examined a body and not detected beetle larva withing 21 days?" The answer will be "No" and that is all the jury will need to hear.

A gold star for you. Exactly.
85 posted on 07/10/2002 4:26:00 PM PDT by pyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: NatureGirl
"I think it was most telling that Faulkner was so puzzled by the bug activity/lack of bugs that he found, that he had to call the ME and ask if the body had been contained somehow."

Big BUMP for that comment.

86 posted on 07/10/2002 4:27:41 PM PDT by mommya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Henrietta
Henrietta, I don't think I followed your drift at first reading. Sorry for skimming! I think you've got it right. The body could have been there as early as the weekend of the 2nd (My theory is Sunday night).
87 posted on 07/10/2002 4:27:53 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom
Still not sure..For some reason ,the body didn't decompose in a natural way. Someone needed a witness to explain "why".
88 posted on 07/10/2002 4:28:02 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: connectthedots
IMO, Feldman's last elicited answer hammered home the impact of Faulkner's testimony.

There is nothing to indicate any reason there is no evidence of earlier insect activity.

That is what the jury is left with for ten days.

Read 'em and weep VDAs.

89 posted on 07/10/2002 4:29:47 PM PDT by Southflanknorthpawsis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: pyx
Can we hear people falling off the fence?
90 posted on 07/10/2002 4:29:59 PM PDT by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
DUSEK again. (what is this, cross/cross examination? How many times does he get to do this?)

Trying to say Flys not attracted to Trash like tires, refrigerators, boxes.etc.

I can't hardly follow DUSEK.

Dusek trying to imply that it took animals several weeks to smell out Daneille's body and bite into it. Thenthe 10-12 days for the fly larvae procedure happened.

JMO: If her body was dumped, animals would have gotten to it the first night.

IMO he just failed to prove Danielle's body was there before approx. 16th FEB.

91 posted on 07/10/2002 4:30:06 PM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: NatureGirl
I missed the last question prior to Feldman dismissing Faulkner. What was the question and the answer?
92 posted on 07/10/2002 4:30:47 PM PDT by connectthedots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
I live in a rural area and see it all the time. 24 hours is more than enough to start.
93 posted on 07/10/2002 4:31:00 PM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
Yeah. Why did he get to come back after redirect???

94 posted on 07/10/2002 4:31:26 PM PDT by Politicalmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: All
Feldman left the jury with a good one!! When he asked Faulkner, "There's no explaination why there were no insects on the body BEFORE Feb. 16th, correct? Answer, "Correct."

I am paraphrasing but think it's close enough. Anyone agree with me?
95 posted on 07/10/2002 4:33:05 PM PDT by the Deejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: All
So is this what everyone got out of the testimony - that although there was some kind of insect stuff that showed the body could've been there 3 weeks - there was other bug stuff that showed this could not be the case - and Dusek tried to divert the jury away from the evidence that excludes the longer timeframe?
96 posted on 07/10/2002 4:33:08 PM PDT by mommya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: connectthedots
Sorry. I'm not following it live at this moment. Can't help.
97 posted on 07/10/2002 4:33:14 PM PDT by NatureGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: connectthedots
Feldman's last question was something to the effect of asking if there was any reasonable explanation for the lack of activity that would indicate and earlier PMI. Faulkner simply answered, "No."
98 posted on 07/10/2002 4:33:16 PM PDT by Southflanknorthpawsis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper; All
Cyn: Look at post 80! This would seem to not go with your Sunday night theory...

All:Now I get it! Thanks to all of you for putting up with my silly questions!

99 posted on 07/10/2002 4:33:47 PM PDT by Henrietta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: NatureGirl
I agree NG--All I know is if I was on that jury I couldn't send this man to the death chamber if I wasn't sure how long her body was there.
100 posted on 07/10/2002 4:33:55 PM PDT by the-gooroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 781-790 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson