Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: connectthedots
IMO, Feldman's last elicited answer hammered home the impact of Faulkner's testimony.

There is nothing to indicate any reason there is no evidence of earlier insect activity.

That is what the jury is left with for ten days.

Read 'em and weep VDAs.

89 posted on 07/10/2002 4:29:47 PM PDT by Southflanknorthpawsis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]


To: All
So is this what everyone got out of the testimony - that although there was some kind of insect stuff that showed the body could've been there 3 weeks - there was other bug stuff that showed this could not be the case - and Dusek tried to divert the jury away from the evidence that excludes the longer timeframe?
96 posted on 07/10/2002 4:33:08 PM PDT by mommya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]

To: Southflanknorthpawsis
I agree.
Faulkner said there is no evidence to the exclusion of the body before the 16th.
In other words her body was protected from insects.

I can't believe her body laid there bug free until the 16th.
105 posted on 07/10/2002 4:36:49 PM PDT by gigi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson