Skip to comments.
Defense could pin hopes on insect life..Westerfield Trial Breaking News: BUG EVIDENCE QUESTIONS!!
Union Tribune ^
| July 10, 2002
| Kristen Green
Posted on 07/10/2002 3:17:09 PM PDT by FresnoDA
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 381-400, 401-420, 421-440 ... 781-790 next last
To: UCANSEE2
Oh sure, if the DA can find the RIGHT perp, he can charge him/them. But it won't be Dusek from the DA's office prosecuting. He'd have too much egg on his face during the whole trial.
To: MizSterious
I wonder if Damon was wearing his orange search vest when he drove to the desert on the weekend of 2/16 in the blue van...
To: crystalk
Remember, there is medical evidence that Danielle was being molested habitually and ongoingly..........The VDs may also have been pimping her out for money, that would explain the constant sexual activity on the part of a 7-yr-old.Where is the medical evidence you are talking about? Where are you getting this information? Like constant sexual activity on the part of a 7-yr-old. What evidence do you have that Danielle was sexually active? Her father might have molested her, but that does not make HER sexually active.
403
posted on
07/10/2002 7:01:51 PM PDT
by
Spunky
To: MizSterious
Folks, we need to remember that the defense is not over. The prosecution have rested. The defense has several days here to come up with new evidence that DW didn't kill her. That break may be in his best interest. They already know what evidence is presented against him. Therefore, they know what they MUST refute. Prosecution is not allowed to present anymore evidence, just cross examine. PRAY THAT JUSTICE WILL BE DONE!
To: All
How can DW be found guilty of abducting Danielle from a place (her home) when she wasn't even THERE, at the time?
And how can he be placed in her home, even if she WASN'T there?
Who picked Danielle up after school Friday, and how long [if at all] did she stay at home before running away or leaving for an engagement?
To: hoosiermama
"PRAY THAT JUSTICE WILL BE DONE!"
I've been praying for DAW every night since this trial started.
To: All
Oh how Danielle must have dreaded Friday nights.
To: crystalk
Remember how everyone(media etc) was calling Pierce a crack pot because of his thoughts about Damon...hmmm
To: crystalk
I'm not unfamiliar with the case, I just don't recall hearing what you're saying. It sounds like a lot of speculation on your part, as if you are reading something into some comments/observations made that aren't really there.
To: rolling_stone
"Remember how everyone(media etc) was calling Pierce a crack pot because of his thoughts about Damon...hmmm"
I have a problem with people that do that just because they don't agree with someone.
To: Spunky
What evidence do you have that Danielle was sexually active? She doesn't. But she's not responsible for educating us, she just told me. Sheesh!!
To: UCANSEE2
Thank you for that update on the VDS. Very interesting...
412
posted on
07/10/2002 7:11:19 PM PDT
by
Lanza
To: crystalk
re:371---You are so right! The only perverted lifestyle PROVEN to me is the VD's and their friends. Not one witness to say DW acted in an inappropriate manner. Where are all the people who attended his sex parties? The prosecution has not brought forth one witness to say he was perverted. This just doesn't make sense to me.
To: rolling_stone
To: Beach_Babe
There has got to video of that van with Damon somewhere. The news crews were everywhere.
Did you get the remarks today about the cops following DW while the news crews followed both DW and Damon? Sounds like the cops followed the wrong guy!
To: Henrietta
This speculation I believe is derived from the Underwear found on the floor of Danielle's room near her dresser.
The media kept saying there was a DISCHARGE that DNA samples were taken from.
Speculation was that it would match DW's sperm.
Of course it didn't.
Then there was speculation it was vaginal discharge, which would be a sign of sexual abuse. That is what they are going on.
PROBLEM with that is that it wasn't vaginal discharge.
It was URINE, SWEAT, regular daily body fluids that are in any young female child's crotch.
To: Politicalmom
What you are saying makes NO sense, and is contrary to the testimony. What I said was exactly as testified. It is possible to disagree while acknowledging another point of view is valid. I don't think it is fair to say I'm making "no sense".
To: All
It just occurred to me....If Danielle was still alive until the 16th or so....Then her blood could have been planted in the MH....AM I thinking clearly?
To: John Jamieson
You're almost right - "bugs don't lie"
However, when the guy finished his testimony, he finally admitted to the prosecutor that he really didn't know how long the body had been there!! And ... the body could have been there for 2 or 3 weeks longer than he had suggested; which means, Westerfield could have dumped the body BEFORE the police started following him.
W H A T?? This is the solid testimony which will prove Westerfield didn't do it?? I don't think so.
The weather is a variable which is very unpredictable. In a house or apartment, where the atmosphere is somewhat regulated, it may bring on the "dead" bugs sooner. But ... with the body being outside, it could have been very cold and very warm within the same day, causing a variance which really hinders the accuracy of the dateline.
I don't think this exonerates Mr. Westerfield at all - in fact, the fiber evidence was much more compelling.
To: MizSterious
How did her blood get on his jacket and rug.
420
posted on
07/10/2002 7:24:24 PM PDT
by
fatima
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 381-400, 401-420, 421-440 ... 781-790 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson