Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Defense could pin hopes on insect life..Westerfield Trial Breaking News: BUG EVIDENCE QUESTIONS!!
Union Tribune ^ | July 10, 2002 | Kristen Green

Posted on 07/10/2002 3:17:09 PM PDT by FresnoDA

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 781-790 next last
To: RnMomof7
Are you teasing me?
141 posted on 07/10/2002 4:49:29 PM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: fnord
I think he needed a big finish before the break, but I'll bet he has more to come. He'll grill (as nicely as he can) Brenda before this over.
142 posted on 07/10/2002 4:49:41 PM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Southflanknorthpawsis
Also Dusek wasn't yelling at this witness, didn't make him cry, wasn't being snide, he was totally respectful and didn't try to damage his credibility in any way. This should help the Defense.
143 posted on 07/10/2002 4:49:45 PM PDT by gigi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: HoneyBoo
Will a week be long enough for the prosecution to come up with some "new" evidence against Westerfield?

I don't know, but they are in an awkward position. I assume that their "heavy" stuff is out there already. If they drag some petty garbage in, it may backfire.

144 posted on 07/10/2002 4:50:51 PM PDT by Southflanknorthpawsis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: All
I love it. We've had three hours of riveting CSI testimony and our local San Diego news station is re-playing the girlfriend because she gave "damaging" evidence about DW. Sheesh.
145 posted on 07/10/2002 4:51:50 PM PDT by HoneyBoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: Southflanknorthpawsis
So why the break for ten days? Is someone going on vacation? Darn.. and this was just starting to get VERY interesting!
146 posted on 07/10/2002 4:51:58 PM PDT by Lanza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: FresnoDA
WHO YOU GONNA CALL? BUG BUSTERS!
147 posted on 07/10/2002 4:52:09 PM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: mommya
mommya---

Was it you who posted 'Girl's week at
Big Bear' a while back -- not sure.... Do you think maybe she was borrowed for a week????

148 posted on 07/10/2002 4:52:17 PM PDT by juzcuz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: HoneyBoo
Will a week be long enough for the prosecution to come up with some "new" evidence against Westerfield? No doubt they'll try.

I don't think that they can do this, since they've already rested their case.

A philosophical thought: Why would any prosecutor be afraid of the truth? Isn't their job to find the truth, not to win at all costs? Seems like DuPRICK has forgotten what his duty is, IMO.

149 posted on 07/10/2002 4:52:18 PM PDT by Henrietta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: the Deejay
I JUST LOVED IT!!

Me too...... ; *) It was so Matlock-ish......lol

150 posted on 07/10/2002 4:52:42 PM PDT by Southflanknorthpawsis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: John Jamieson
Yes, frezzer too and the body would probably take several more days to thaw after it was dumped.

That was my thought it would take at least two additional, maybe three days..during which the body would be very attractive to animals as it would be moist..yet the abdomen was not eaten correct?

151 posted on 07/10/2002 4:53:54 PM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Henrietta
Thank you for correcting me.

According to Stealth Ninja Dave page, was arrested on Feb 22. But was under heavy police surveillance prior to that, including GPS attached to his car, so same diff, right?

The jury would realize DW was under police surveillance very early in Feb, so he couldn't have just stepped out and dumped the body. The GPS showed he never went near Dehesa RD. You are so right, Henrietta.

152 posted on 07/10/2002 4:54:26 PM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
Thanks UCANSEE. Since I didn't get to see or hear for myself the last 2 hrs. of testimony - I appreciate your assurance that this was clear to the jury. It is clear to me - she wasn't there before the 16th-18th. I'm pretty well off the fence. If I'm sittin in the jury box - I'm thinkin not guilty.
153 posted on 07/10/2002 4:56:02 PM PDT by mommya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: Henrietta
Prosecution can still bring in rebuttal witnesses at the end.
154 posted on 07/10/2002 4:56:30 PM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: HoneyBoo
re-playing the girlfriend because she gave "damaging" evidence about DW

What did she say that was "damaging"? I missed it.

155 posted on 07/10/2002 4:56:38 PM PDT by sbnsd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: sbnsd
You said it.
156 posted on 07/10/2002 4:57:11 PM PDT by HoneyBoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: alexandria
IT WOULD HAVE HAD TO HAVE BEEN SEALED IN PLASTIC to have made a difference.

Alexandria pointed out that this would have kept the body moist.

She is right.

Keeping the body in a paper bag would have allowed it to dry.

But only if it was sealed. If not, bugs would have gotten in.

157 posted on 07/10/2002 4:57:29 PM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
Yes, it was. Not the chest.
158 posted on 07/10/2002 4:57:50 PM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: Southflanknorthpawsis
"Exactly !!! Maybe a reasonable person could buy a couple of days discrepancy, but we are looking at two weeks after 2/1-2/2."

Yes, and if she was somehow mummified out in an open air environment, by the 16th, at least some insects would have found their way to her during the pre-mummification phase.

Based on what we've just heard, I too, don't see how, as you say, a reasonable person could buy that she was there prior to DW's 24 hour surveillance.

The question, IMO, is who had her and where?

In any case, I don't see it as having been a good day for Dusek and his prosecution team.

159 posted on 07/10/2002 4:58:28 PM PDT by theirjustdue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: juzcuz
Yes - I did post that - and am wondering if it fits in somehow - just dunno how.
160 posted on 07/10/2002 4:58:34 PM PDT by mommya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 781-790 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson