Dusek couldn't go after Faulkner since the SD prosecutor has successfully used him before as an expert witness. Faulkner was very poite and did not go out of his way to make Dusek look stupid. He merely answered Dusek's questions as best he could without trying to help the defense. If Dusek had tried to attack Faulkner's credibility, Faulkner would have destroyed him.
The simple fact of the matter is, the insect evidence almost compels the jury to acquit DW. Somebody killed Danielle, but there is far too little evidence pointing to DW.
Some of the pizza partiers have lawyered-up. I wonder how many more are thinking of finding legal representation after today.
The fact that the prosecution hired him and considered him credible enough to have on THEIR team..gives this science and this man credibility.
The fact they discarded him when his findings did not support their case is deadly IMHO..and should be played up in closing arguments