To: goldilucky
Discovery is not going to happen in Klayman's case because his case if frivilous and will/should be thrown out.
Which, of course, will call for another press release in which Larry claims that "they are out to get him."
To: Howlin
The issue of "frivilous" is moot. The facts may be further proven through discovery. To throw out a lawful complaint because someone thinks the facts are frivilous is obstruction of justice, malfeasance, and gross violation of due process. It is not for the court to be conducting themselves as lawyers but instead as neutral and to accept the claims and later determine them to be valid through discovery. The issue of a "frivilous" claim has become a long worn term used as a legal blocking machination to block discovery that the term might as well fit for the same purpose that the issue of immunity clause for elected officials is commonly invoked as a defense.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson