[goldilucky]

The issue of "frivilous" is moot. The facts may be further proven through discovery. To throw out a lawful complaint because someone thinks the facts are frivilous is obstruction of justice, malfeasance, and gross violation of due process. It is not for the court to be conducting themselves as lawyers but instead as neutral and to accept the claims and later determine them to be valid through discovery. The issue of a "frivilous" claim has become a long worn term used as a legal blocking machination to block discovery that the term might as well fit for the same purpose that the issue of immunity clause for elected officials is commonly invoked as a defense.

[Howlin]

If I understand your posts correctly, you're saying that this case should continue IN CASE there is anything out there that Larry might use to smear Cheney and/or Bush.

That is NOT the way the law works; I've read his pleading. Larry's clients bought their stock AFTER the alledged 'crime'..........haven't you ever heard of "Let the buyer beware?"

[Amelia]

Apparently Larry only believes the 4th Amendment applies to Judicial Watch?