Halliburton Responds to Larry Klayman's Supersillyous Suit(My Title)

CBS Market Watch "Big Charts" Web Site ^ | 7/10/2002 | MarketWatch.com

[Howlin]

This is going to get GOOD real quick. This is one case that Klayman won't be able to hide from the public.

[Howlin]

He's salivating for a case, isn't he? Despicable little man.

Is that show rerun? Can we get a transcript?

[Iwo Jima]

It ith weally dethspicable that you thilly people would get tho bent out of thape about thomebody's opinions about a thong. Thurely, you would agree that the world needs more thongs. Twy not to be tho thancimonious.

[Clara Lou]

This is one case that Klayman won't be able to hide.
Excellent point, and I think you are quite right.

[Iwo Jima]

Don't know. Hope so! You cannot believe how bad it/he was. It was a malicious act of slander. Plus he was clearly wrong about the facts and the law. He thought that the case had been brought by Halliburton employees (or Laura said that and he didn't correct her).

To say that this man is slime is degrading to slime. I am sure that slime serves some biological purpose.

[Iwo Jima]

I haven't had a martini in years. I may need to visit the liquor closet (usually only for guests).

[ned]

I just heard Larry Klayman on Laura Ingraham's show. After trying to hide behind phrases like "our complaint alleges," he finally said that he personally believes that Dick Cheney intentionally and deliberately defrauded investors.

Hangin is too good for a dog like Klayman!

[Miss Marple]

Klayman is toast. I happened to be in the car today, and although I normally don't listen to Limbaugh any more, I had to have something on and he was it.

Limbaugh had assembled a list of newspaper articles going back to the mid-90's. ALL of the articles called JW a "conservative group."

Except today, when the papers are labeling him "non-partisan."

Limbaugh said he would probably get sued for running the piece. Ha!

[Clara Lou]

Hmmm-- there may be a class acation suit in this for Larry on behalf of all the slime who feels slighted by the comparison.

[hole_n_one]

If I didn't know better, I'd say that Paula Zahn has the hots for ol' Larry.

[Iwo Jima]

"Klayman has passed that fine line from total moronic jerk to evil egotistical troll..

Based on my personal experience, he passed that line years ago, if in fact he was ever on the right side of that line.

[Iwo Jima]

"I am committed to bringing him down, with whatever I can do."

I am ready to rumble, too. Bring it on!

[Miss Marple]

Please, think of a way we can sue Klayman!! I will chip in, and I am sure others will as well!

"That's all I can stands, I can't stands no more!!!"

[Iwo Jima]

You are a jewel.

[deport]

If I didn't know better, I'd say that Paula Zahn has the hots for ol' Larry.

Maybe one or two others also......

[Texasforever]

How about a Halliburton shareholder suit against JW for all Halliburton stock losses as a result of this suit when it is found to be without merit?

[Miss Marple]

See post 896. What do you think?

The only thing is that I want to do something NOW!!!

[deport]

Radio show? I don't see where she has archives as such but does list clips of some of her guest. Maybe she'll put that one of him saying that up......

[Iwo Jima]

Yes, I need to be mindful of the lowlife, skid row bums and others of that "calibre" who are used to be called slime but who revolt against being compared to Larry Klayman.

[Howlin]

Look at this:

Email this article	Printer friendly page
For Immediate Release
Jul 11, 2002	Contact: Press Office 202-646-5172
OVERWHELMING PUBLIC SUPPORT FOR JUDICIAL WATCH LAWSUIT AGAINST VP CHENEY & HALLIBURTON CNN Internet Survey Shows 95% of Americans Want Answers From VP Cheney Regarding Halliburton Accounting Lawsuit is Strong Legal Action During Period of Financial Crisis Marked by Political Rhetoric and Posturing (Washington, DC) Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption and abuse, said today that the lawsuit it brought on behalf of Halliburton shareholders against Vice President Dick Cheney, the other involved directors of Halliburton, as well as Halliburton and the Arthur Andersen accounting firm, for alleged fraudulent accounting practices, enjoys overwhelming public support. A CNN poll, featured on the Internet web site of Lou Dobbs, the anchor and managing editor of “Lou Dobb’s Moneyline” – the prestigious and authoritative financial and business news program – revealed that 95% of the respondents answered “Yes” to the question, “Should Vice President Dick Cheney answer questions about accounting at Halliburton?” A similar poll on the Judicial Watch web site (www.JudicialWatch.org) shows 83% of respondents answering “Yes” to the question, “Should Vice president Cheney be required to answer accounting questions about Halliburton?” Interestingly, both the “Moneyline” and Judicial Watch web sites are likely frequented by large numbers of economic and social conservatives. This proves that conservatives are as concerned as liberals about Cheney’s alleged involvement in stock fraud. “The American people are fed-up with corporate fraud and powerful politicians operating as if they were above the law. The life savings of millions of Americans have been devastated by a string of major bankruptcies and alleged fraudulent corporate accounting practices. President Bush and other Congressional leaders have spent weeks talking about cracking down on corporate fraud – but at Judicial Watch, we are doing something about it, not just talking about it. Vice President Cheney has a lot of questions to answer about his days at Halliburton, and President Bush should take responsibility for his Vice President. It is extremely hypocritical and improper for President Bush to chastise Wall Street and corporate CEO’s and rush to propose more regulation of private industry while simultaneously dodging questions and making dismissive remarks about his Vice President’s own alleged improper business practices,” stated Judicial Watch Chairman and General Counsel Larry Klayman.