[Texasforever]

How about a Halliburton shareholder suit against JW for all Halliburton stock losses as a result of this suit when it is found to be without merit?

[Miss Marple]

See post 896. What do you think?

The only thing is that I want to do something NOW!!!

[ned]

How about a Halliburton shareholder suit against JW for all Halliburton stock losses as a result of this suit when it is found to be without merit?

All it would take, I think, is force Judicial Watch to comply with the IRS audit.

[Iwo Jima]

Now, it seems to me that if a company UNDERESTIMATED its income from these charges, etc., then an investor who sold too cheap would have as much reason to complain as an investor who bought too dear due to "too high" estimates. Maybe someone who DIDN'T buy (of which I am one) should sue because if the charges had been more accurate, I would have bought and ultimately would have realized a profit.

The point is that these are LOSING jury arguments. These Plaintiffs will never be able to make a case that anything which was done caused them harm.

Klayman does not understand these issues because he has never had a jury trial and has no concept of how to present compelling evidence to a jury. His only frame of reference is how he can WOW contributors, important donators such as Ross Perot, and mindless syncophants such as Rebeckie.