| This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
|
Locked on 07/19/2002 11:14:21 PM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:
Flame war. |
Posted on 07/10/2002 11:04:03 AM PDT by SierraWasp
12:57PM Halliburton responds to Judicial Watch lawsuit (HAL) by Michael Baron Halliburton (HAL) is off 30 cents, or 2.1 percent, to $13.82, in midday action. The company is out with a press release responding to a lawsuit filed by Judicial Watch, a Washington, D.C.-based legal watchdog group. The suit alleges fraudulent accounting practices at Halliburton took place during the period when current vice president Dick Cheney served as its chairman and CEO. Halliburton called the claims in the suit, "untrue, unsupported, and unfounded." The company continued: "We are working diligently with the SEC to resolve its questions regarding the company's accounting procedures. Halliburton has always followed and will continue to follow guidelines established by the SEC and GAAP, General Accepted Accounting Principles."
Do you have any evidence whatsoever that there ARE any?
Let's look in and see what they're up to.....
You suck.
No, you suck. I'm a girl. Leave me alone.
Answer yes or NO!!
You're putting words in my mouth.
Yeah, what else are you putting in your mouth?
You're sooooo 80's
Well, you're a Klaman lover.
Am not...
As you can see, things are still cooking. Tune in tomorrow for the latest update.
Yeah, well you stink.
Hmmpph, did you graduate high school?
I took a couple of semesters of accounting...want to know my opinion of Klayman's charges against Cheney? :)
Counselor you are, of course correct.
Try to be more original next time...k?"
There wasn't any Talking Point on her sheet that covered that so she had to improvise. She'll try harder next time.
Good morning, Cartoon Boy! I'm glad to see you too!
Sure I agree with goldi's statement.
I also think that you should be held personally accountable for any and all kiddy porn pictures that you've created and put on the web.
And don't say you haven't created any. The case hasn't been to court yet, so we just don't know, do we?
"Do you have any evidence whatsoever that there ARE any?"
About the same as you might have about Ken Lay and Enron.
I mean when I saw Larry the K on Aaron Brown the other night, his hair had lost that ultra-poufiness of his early morning press conference and he was definitely moist, if not downright sweaty, in that upper lip/drippers area. It's doggone hard to race from one interview to another while having to actual legal work, you know.
But, well, if one has a real case, one doesn't have to try it in the press...and the stronger the case, the less you'll see and hear from the lawyer, especially in a high-profile case.
So true. Meaning he has no case and he is a publicity hound (almost used harsher wording there)
I'd add "fund-raiser" to that "publicity hound" description.
Actually, I was just wondering if a public official may be impeached for misconduct comitted prior to their election to current public office.
I believe they can, as Article II, section 4, of the U.S. Constitution does not specifically put this limitation on the issue of Impeachment.
car·toon Pronunciation Key (kär-tn) n.1. A drawing depicting a humorous situation, often accompanied by a caption.
2. A drawing representing current public figures or issues symbolically and often satirically: a political cartoon.v. car·tooned, car·toon·ing, car·toons
v. intr.
To make humorous or satirical drawings.
It seems fairly accurate. Besides, Photo Composite Boy just doesn't have the same ring to it, does it?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.